SMF - Just Installed!
I'm offically adding Y&S, for "Yeesh & Sheesh", a phrase i find myself using all too often in exasperation at the predictability/Classic rock meatheadedness of Drive and Sound 10@10s.
added this week: "LN" for "least necessary" song on a set. As is our wont, there can of course be more than one per set: LN1, LN2 etc etc.
Quote from: RGMike on January 19, 2012, 08:35:06 AMadded this week: "LN" for "least necessary" song on a set. As is our wont, there can of course be more than one per set: LN1, LN2 etc etc.Rod came up with a new one today - Worst of Least Necessary. WOLN would be technically correct, but I think WORN would be more appropriate.
Quote from: RGMike on January 19, 2012, 08:35:06 AMadded this week: "LN" for "least necessary" song on a set. As is our wont, there can of course be more than one per set: LN1, LN2 etc etc.Like "Katrina", we can use "Dead Man's Party" (DMP) or something similar in its place......
Quote from: IntellectualElitist on January 19, 2012, 11:03:36 AMQuote from: RGMike on January 19, 2012, 08:35:06 AMadded this week: "LN" for "least necessary" song on a set. As is our wont, there can of course be more than one per set: LN1, LN2 etc etc.Rod came up with a new one today - Worst of Least Necessary. WOLN would be technically correct, but I think WORN would be more appropriate.Would that be the least-least-least necessary, or the actual worst song of the LNs?
What would a song or artist be if you like it/them, nobody else does, but you aren't embarrassed about it? That is, not a guilty pleasure because you won't acknowledge that there is no/little musical merit?
Quote from: IntellectualElitist on January 25, 2012, 12:09:10 PMWhat would a song or artist be if you like it/them, nobody else does, but you aren't embarrassed about it? That is, not a guilty pleasure because you won't acknowledge that there is no/little musical merit?A Tom Petty?
Quote from: Lightnin' Rod on January 25, 2012, 12:40:48 PMQuote from: IntellectualElitist on January 25, 2012, 12:09:10 PMWhat would a song or artist be if you like it/them, nobody else does, but you aren't embarrassed about it? That is, not a guilty pleasure because you won't acknowledge that there is no/little musical merit?A Tom Petty? Don Henley?Grateful Dead?
Quote from: ggould on January 25, 2012, 07:48:19 PMQuote from: Lightnin' Rod on January 25, 2012, 12:40:48 PMQuote from: IntellectualElitist on January 25, 2012, 12:09:10 PMWhat would a song or artist be if you like it/them, nobody else does, but you aren't embarrassed about it? That is, not a guilty pleasure because you won't acknowledge that there is no/little musical merit?A Tom Petty? Don Henley?Grateful Dead?Rush?
Quote from: Tinka Cat on January 25, 2012, 08:22:24 PMQuote from: ggould on January 25, 2012, 07:48:19 PMQuote from: Lightnin' Rod on January 25, 2012, 12:40:48 PMQuote from: IntellectualElitist on January 25, 2012, 12:09:10 PMWhat would a song or artist be if you like it/them, nobody else does, but you aren't embarrassed about it? That is, not a guilty pleasure because you won't acknowledge that there is no/little musical merit?A Tom Petty? Don Henley?Grateful Dead?Rush? Stevie Nicks?
Quote from: sundaygal on January 25, 2012, 08:40:09 PMQuote from: Tinka Cat on January 25, 2012, 08:22:24 PMQuote from: ggould on January 25, 2012, 07:48:19 PMQuote from: Lightnin' Rod on January 25, 2012, 12:40:48 PMQuote from: IntellectualElitist on January 25, 2012, 12:09:10 PMWhat would a song or artist be if you like it/them, nobody else does, but you aren't embarrassed about it? That is, not a guilty pleasure because you won't acknowledge that there is no/little musical merit?A Tom Petty? Don Henley?Grateful Dead?Rush? Stevie Nicks? Chicago?
