10at10 Club

Main Discussion Area => KFOG's 10@10 => Topic started by: CapnJack on May 06, 2014, 07:33:20 PM

Title: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 06, 2014, 07:33:20 PM
FB request thread is up.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: Here'sToYa! on May 06, 2014, 09:22:54 PM
FB request thread is up.

Yup. Good requests, Cap'n.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: Big Fingers McGee on May 06, 2014, 09:31:06 PM
FB request thread is up.

Yup. Good requests, Cap'n.

A-ha!
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 10:05:36 AM
TOTHK - The Beach Boys "Heroes And Villians"

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/eb/Heroes_and_Villains_Smile_Sessions.jpg)

"Heroes & Villians" is on the verge of becoming "Heroes & 'Trinas". But BOS1 anyway.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 10:09:50 AM
Dandy Livingstone "Rudy, A Message To You"

(http://rgcred.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/dandy-livingstone-rudy-a-message-to-you.jpg)

the orig "message to Rudie" -- Dandy Livingstone! BOS1.  AL has played this before.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 10:12:33 AM
what's happening in San Francisco ---> Jefferson Airplane "Somebody To Love"

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/pt/4/43/Jefferson_airplane-somebody_to_love_s.jpg)

sheesh, I love Grace but never need hear "Somebody to Love" ever again. How many 10@10 appearances has this made, just in the AL era alone?
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 10:15:57 AM
more about what's happening in San Francisco ---> Richie Havens "San Francisco Bay Blues"

(http://www.twitteringmachines.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/richie-havens2.jpg)

OMGWTFLOL: BOS7 Richie Havens down by the San Francisco gays, er, Bay.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: Here'sToYa! on May 07, 2014, 10:17:21 AM
what's happening in San Francisco ---> Jefferson Airplane "Somebody To Love"

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/pt/4/43/Jefferson_airplane-somebody_to_love_s.jpg)

For better or worse, Jim Carrey hijacked this song for me in The Cable Guy.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 10:19:36 AM
The Seeds "Can't Seem To Make You Mine"

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/75/The_Seeds_-_Can't_Seem_to_Make_You_Mine.jpg)

ETA: Bustout?
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 10:21:47 AM
Spencer Davis Group "Gimme Some Lovin'"

(http://www.rankopedia.com/CandidatePix/108425.gif)

LN: "Gimme Some Lovin'"
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 10:24:32 AM
Valley Of The Dolls ---> Wilson Pickett "Funky Broadway"

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-oxS-9HOMtXQ/T7tpLrInghI/AAAAAAAABU4/pfzSWIws0Lo/s1600/funky+wils)

TANC: Valley of the Dolls!!!  Sparkle, Neely, sparkle!
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 10:27:19 AM
more Valley Of The Dolls ---> Gladys Knight & The Pips "I Heard It Through The Grapevine"

(https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8377/8452380481_006d093c13_z.jpg)

BOS2 Gladys
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 10:30:45 AM
You Only Live Twice (I think) The Avengers ---> The Who "I Can See For Miles"

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f3/I_can_see_for_miles.jpg)

BOS6 The Avengers. Oh, Mrs Peel!

borderline LN but still one of the greatest 45s ever: the 'oo seeing for miles.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 10:34:53 AM
The Trip ---> Pink Floyd "See Emily Play"

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/29/SeeEmilyPlay.jpg)

Whoa! I'm tripping!

BOS4 the Pinko Floyds, "See Emily Play"...I adore this song.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: urth on May 07, 2014, 10:36:52 AM
clip ---> Pink Floyd "See Emily Play"

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/29/SeeEmilyPlay.jpg)

Listened to two different 67 sets over the weekend -- one from Dave's reign, and one earlier AL creation, and See Emily Play was in both. (Not that there's anything wrong with that.)
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: Big Fingers McGee on May 07, 2014, 10:38:40 AM
BOS for See Emily Play
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: Here'sToYa! on May 07, 2014, 10:39:03 AM
This was a delightful set.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 10:52:35 AM
Wow, some of the segues were recycled from previous sets (e.g. Valley Of The Dolls--->Funky Broadway; The Avengers--->I Can See For Miles; The Trip--->See Emily Play).  I wonder how RGMike would feel about this set... letdown, perhaps?
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: Lightnin' Rod on May 07, 2014, 11:26:39 AM
clip ---> Pink Floyd "See Emily Play"

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/29/SeeEmilyPlay.jpg)

Listened to two different 67 sets over the weekend -- one from Dave's reign, and one earlier AL creation, and See Emily Play was in both. (Not that there's anything wrong with that.)

It's become a frequent flyer for sure.

BOS, the 'oo.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: CapnJack on May 07, 2014, 01:33:37 PM
Wednesday, May 7, 2014

1. Beach Boys - Heroes & Villians
2. Dandy Livingstone - Rudy, A Message To You
    (TV: BBC "SF Where It's At)
3. Jefferson Airplane - Somebody to Love
    (TV: BBC "SF Hippies")
4. Richie Haven - S.F. Bay Blues *BOS*
5. The Seeds - Can't Seem to Make You Mine
6. Spencer Davis Group - Gimme Some Lovin'
    (Movie: Valley of the Dolls)
7. Wilson Pickett - Funky Broadway
8. Gladys Knight & the Pips - Heard It Through the Grapevine
    (Movie: The Avengers)
9. The Who - I Can See for Miles
    (Movie: The Trip)
10. Pink Floyd - See Emily Play
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: dischead on May 07, 2014, 10:21:12 PM
what's happening in San Francisco ---> Jefferson Airplane "Somebody To Love"
sheesh, I love Grace but never need hear "Somebody to Love" ever again. How many 10@10 appearances has this made, just in the AL era alone?

While I would give it a high LNQ, it has only been played four times previously on 10@10 -- twice
by Dave, and twice by Annalisa.  The Queen song with the same title has appeared more than
three times as often.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: dischead on May 07, 2014, 10:26:23 PM
The Seeds "Can't Seem To Make You Mine"

ETA: Bustout?

Yep.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: dischead on May 07, 2014, 11:12:12 PM
Wow, some of the segues were recycled from previous sets (e.g. Valley Of The Dolls--->Funky Broadway; The Avengers--->I Can See For Miles; The Trip--->See Emily Play).  I wonder how RGMike would feel about this set... letdown, perhaps?

I won't pretend to know how RGMike would feel about this set, but I know how I feel...  On the
one side of the ledger, 1967 is a very strong year and even songs with a high LNQ sound pretty
good.  And today's set continues the general trend we've been seeing with AL 2.0 -- most of
the tracks haven't been played a lot on 10@10 (even if some are LN).  So I found today's set
very pleasant.  On the other side, little new ground is being broken, and it almost seems like
one would have to intentionally work at that with a year like this.  I didn't find today's set
rousing, inspiring, surprising, or delightful.  It could have been at least some of those things.
I don't expect much from the late '70s, but a late '60s set should be much better.

BOS for the Beach Boys, Richie Havens, and Pink Floyd.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: Big Fingers McGee on May 08, 2014, 05:33:30 AM
Listening to the replay last night, I was reminded what a spectacular effort "Gimme Some Lovin'" is.... yes, it is an LN of one of the highest orders, but it really seemed to hit the spot.
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: Here'sToYa! on May 08, 2014, 10:21:24 AM
Wow, some of the segues were recycled from previous sets (e.g. Valley Of The Dolls--->Funky Broadway; The Avengers--->I Can See For Miles; The Trip--->See Emily Play).  I wonder how RGMike would feel about this set... letdown, perhaps?

I won't pretend to know how RGMike would feel about this set, but I know how I feel...  On the
one side of the ledger, 1967 is a very strong year and even songs with a high LNQ sound pretty
good.  And today's set continues the general trend we've been seeing with AL 2.0 -- most of
the tracks haven't been played a lot on 10@10 (even if some are LN).  So I found today's set
very pleasant.  On the other side, little new ground is being broken, and it almost seems like
one would have to intentionally work at that with a year like this.  I didn't find today's set
rousing, inspiring, surprising, or delightful.  It could have been at least some of those things.
I don't expect much from the late '70s, but a late '60s set should be much better.

BOS for the Beach Boys, Richie Havens, and Pink Floyd.

What a chasm between pleasant and delightful.

(http://www.impawards.com/1998/posters/pleasantville_ver2.jpg)
Title: Re: 7 May 2014: it's... 1967!
Post by: dischead on May 08, 2014, 02:35:25 PM
Wow, some of the segues were recycled from previous sets (e.g. Valley Of The Dolls--->Funky Broadway; The Avengers--->I Can See For Miles; The Trip--->See Emily Play).  I wonder how RGMike would feel about this set... letdown, perhaps?
I won't pretend to know how RGMike would feel about this set, but I know how I feel...  On the
one side of the ledger, 1967 is a very strong year and even songs with a high LNQ sound pretty
good.  And today's set continues the general trend we've been seeing with AL 2.0 -- most of
the tracks haven't been played a lot on 10@10 (even if some are LN).  So I found today's set
very pleasant.  On the other side, little new ground is being broken, and it almost seems like
one would have to intentionally work at that with a year like this.  I didn't find today's set
rousing, inspiring, surprising, or delightful.  It could have been at least some of those things.
I don't expect much from the late '70s, but a late '60s set should be much better.

BOS for the Beach Boys, Richie Havens, and Pink Floyd.
What a chasm between pleasant and delightful.

A chasm implies there's a large negative space.  While there may be a little distance between the two,
it's just an upward slope.