10at10 Club

Main Discussion Area => KFOG's 10@10 => Topic started by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 07:39:09 AM

Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 07:39:09 AM
a fine way to start the week.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 09:25:52 AM
i hope dave plays lots of "i hate work" songs. it's already been one of those mondays.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Gazoo on February 28, 2005, 10:02:42 AM
Might be hard to do in 1969, unless Dave plays Savoy Brown's tangentially related "I'm Tired."
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:03:31 AM
Extra! Extra! read all about it!  Who & Dylan in a one-two-punch!
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:03:41 AM
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Might be hard to do in 1969, unless Dave plays Savoy Brown's tangentially related "I'm Tired."


pinball wizard made me feel like breaking things. that will do just fine.

wow! maybe bos for "lay, lady, lay!!!!!!!"
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Gazoo on February 28, 2005, 10:04:06 AM
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:05:58 AM
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


whatever. it's much better than that awful rod stewart song you all love. :)
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:08:24 AM
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!

Mmmmmmmmmmm! Nilsson... BOS perhaps.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:08:33 AM
ahhh.....
i loves me some nilsson.

yay, dave!
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Alicat on February 28, 2005, 10:08:37 AM
Quote from: "RGMike"
Extra! Extra! read all about it!  Who & Dylan in a one-two-punch!

Just wonderful.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Davefish on February 28, 2005, 10:09:14 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
ahhh.....
i loves me some nilsson.

yay, dave!

Nilsson Schmilsson, as long as he loves his mother!
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:10:02 AM
Quote from: "Alicat"
Quote from: "RGMike"
Extra! Extra! read all about it!  Who & Dylan in a one-two-punch!

Just wonderful.


hey there, how was tahoe?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:11:59 AM
OMGWFTLOL! "Long Green" -- who? Trini Lopez?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:13:23 AM
Quote from: "RGMike"
OMGWFTLOL! "Long Green" -- who? Trini Lopez?


sounds right.

aahhh!!!!! yay! nothing is easy!
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: urth on February 28, 2005, 10:14:09 AM
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!

Mmmmmmmmmmm! Nilsson... BOS perhaps.


Actually I've heard Dylan get credit for that as a result of Subterranean Homesick Blues, too.

Geoff will be happy to hear the Nilsson tune, too.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:14:16 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "RGMike"
OMGWFTLOL! "Long Green" -- who? Trini Lopez?


sounds right.

aahhh!!!!! yay! nothing is easy!


Apollo 11 into "Nothing is Easy". Cute, Dave
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Gazoo on February 28, 2005, 10:14:57 AM
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!

By virtue of bad grammar?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: urth on February 28, 2005, 10:15:05 AM
And BOS2: Tull, Nothing is Easy. I suspect Rod will concur.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:15:56 AM
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!

By virtue of bad grammar?


i think that's "gramma." i can never keep the lay/lie thing straight.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:18:44 AM
BOS 2: one of my fave Marvin tunes.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: mshray on February 28, 2005, 10:19:37 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!

By virtue of bad grammar?


i think that's "gramma." i can never keep the lay/lie thing straight.


Mshray the grammarian to the rescue!

"Lie" is an intransitive verb, meaning it can NOT take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "lay" & past participle is "lain".

"Lay in a transitive verb, meaning it MUST take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "laid" & past participle is "laid".
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:19:58 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!

By virtue of bad grammar?


i think that's "gramma." i can never keep the lay/lie thing straight.


no, "gramma" is who Jamie Foxx thanked last nite :D
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Alicat on February 28, 2005, 10:21:15 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!

By virtue of bad grammar?


i think that's "gramma." i can never keep the lay/lie thing straight.


Mshray the grammarian to the rescue!

"Lie" is an intransitive verb, meaning it can NOT take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "lay" & past participle is "lain".

"Lay in a transitive verb, meaning it MUST take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "laid" & past participle is "laid".


Speak English man! I can speak properly but your knowledge boggles my brain.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:21:48 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!

By virtue of bad grammar?


i think that's "gramma." i can never keep the lay/lie thing straight.


Mshray the grammarian to the rescue!

"Lie" is an intransitive verb, meaning it can NOT take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "lay" & past participle is "lain".

"Lay in a transitive verb, meaning it MUST take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "laid" & past participle is "laid".


so if bob was telling someone to "lay lady, lay" that would be correct? but since he's singing, "lay, lady, lay," it's incorrect? he should be singing, "lie, lady, lie?"

what an awful rhyme that would make.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:22:15 AM
Quote from: "RGMike"

no, "gramma" is who Jamie Foxx thanked last nite :D


harde-har...
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:23:00 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!

By virtue of bad grammar?


i think that's "gramma." i can never keep the lay/lie thing straight.


Mshray the grammarian to the rescue!

"Lie" is an intransitive verb, meaning it can NOT take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "lay" & past participle is "lain".

"Lay in a transitive verb, meaning it MUST take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "laid" & past participle is "laid".


so if bob was telling someone to "lay lady, lay" that would be correct? but since he's singing, "lay, lady, lay," it's incorrect? he should be singing, "lie, lady, lie?"

what an awful rhyme that would make.


so he was using poetic license?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:25:22 AM
"Mystery Man"? 'tis a mystery to me.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: mshray on February 28, 2005, 10:25:31 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!

By virtue of bad grammar?


i think that's "gramma." i can never keep the lay/lie thing straight.


Mshray the grammarian to the rescue!

"Lie" is an intransitive verb, meaning it can NOT take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "lay" & past participle is "lain".

"Lay in a transitive verb, meaning it MUST take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "laid" & past participle is "laid".


so if bob was telling someone to "lay lady, lay" that would be correct? but since he's singing, "lay, lady, lay," it's incorrect? he should be singing, "lie, lady, lie?"

what an awful rhyme that would make.


Lay requires an object, so he should (if I read his intent correctly) say, "Lay yourself across my big brass bed."  And start unbuttoning while you're at it.

Ali, I don't just speak English, I teach it.  :wink:
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:25:51 AM
i will designate myself set-recorder o' the evening...this is a good one!

babe, babe, babe, babe, you know i'm gonna lay you not lie you down.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Alicat on February 28, 2005, 10:26:09 AM
tying with others for BOS, Zep. Can't pick just one.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:27:31 AM
Quote from: "mshray"

Lay requires an object, so he should (if I read his intent correctly) say, "Lay yourself across my big brass bed."  And start unbuttoning while you're at it.

Ali, I don't just speak English, I teach it.  :wink:


ok, well it's implied. :) which word is used to give a direct order?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Lightnin' Rod on February 28, 2005, 10:28:45 AM
Quote from: "urth"
And BOS2: Tull, Nothing is Easy. I suspect Rod will concur.


Yes the Tull was tasty, and this is a favorite Zep tune.  So I'm torn.  Pleasantly so.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Davefish on February 28, 2005, 10:29:00 AM
I had my artistic license revoked.   :(
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:30:26 AM
Quote from: "Davefish"
I had my artistic license revoked.   :(


were you doing spoken word under the influence?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: urth on February 28, 2005, 10:31:17 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.


Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!

By virtue of bad grammar?


i think that's "gramma." i can never keep the lay/lie thing straight.


Mshray the grammarian to the rescue!

"Lie" is an intransitive verb, meaning it can NOT take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "lay" & past participle is "lain".

"Lay in a transitive verb, meaning it MUST take a direct object.  It's past tense form is "laid" & past participle is "laid".


so if bob was telling someone to "lay lady, lay" that would be correct? but since he's singing, "lay, lady, lay," it's incorrect? he should be singing, "lie, lady, lie?"

what an awful rhyme that would make.


Lay requires an object, so he should (if I read his intent correctly) say, "Lay yourself across my big brass bed."  And start unbuttoning while you're at it.

Ali, I don't just speak English, I teach it.  :wink:


Dude, that's one profound difference between you and me. I know the difference, but I'll be damned if I could have explained it.

BOS3 for the Zep tune (just to stay on topic). Have we heard this before?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Davefish on February 28, 2005, 10:31:51 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Davefish"
I had my artistic license revoked.   :(


were you doing spoken word under the influence?

Under the influence of, oh, I don't know...Satan!
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:32:07 AM
woohoo!! a fine ending: david on laura!
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: mshray on February 28, 2005, 10:32:41 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "mshray"

Lay requires an object, so he should (if I read his intent correctly) say, "Lay yourself across my big brass bed."  And start unbuttoning while you're at it.

Ali, I don't just speak English, I teach it.  :wink:


ok, well it's implied. :) which word is used to give a direct order?


Either one.  Any verb can be used in the imperative (order giving) voice.

But while you can say "Run!", it doesn't make any sense to say "Put!"  "Put" requires an object..."Put your clothes away!"
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: urth on February 28, 2005, 10:33:09 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
i will designate myself set-recorder o' the evening...this is a good one!

babe, babe, babe, babe, you know i'm gonna lay you not lie you down.


Thanks!--it's my yoga night tonight, so I'm likely out of contention.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:33:14 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
woohoo!! a fine ending: david on laura!


yee-haw!  it's a hoedown. (as opposed to a 'ho, down).
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:34:11 AM
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
woohoo!! a fine ending: david on laura!


yee-haw!  it's a hoedown. (as opposed to a 'ho, down).


lay your ho down, melanie!
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:34:46 AM
Quote from: "mshray"


Either one.  Any verb can be used in the imperative (order giving) voice.

But while you can say "Run!", it doesn't make any sense to say "Put!"  "Put" requires an object..."Put your clothes away!"


so dylan isn't using bad grammar, after all. he's giving a direct order.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: mshray on February 28, 2005, 10:35:11 AM
Quote from: "Davefish"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Davefish"
I had my artistic license revoked.   :(


were you doing spoken word under the influence?

Under the influence of, oh, I don't know...Satan!


"don't wanna go by the devil, don't wanna go by the Satan."

dunt dunt dunt-dah dah-dah-dunt
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:36:17 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
a fine ending


it ain't over 'til the thin millionaire sings.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:37:55 AM
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
a fine ending


it ain't over 'til the thin millionaire sings.


and shakes his ass at the superbowl.

but watch yoself! the fcc is listening.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: mshray on February 28, 2005, 10:38:09 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "mshray"


Either one.  Any verb can be used in the imperative (order giving) voice.

But while you can say "Run!", it doesn't make any sense to say "Put!"  "Put" requires an object..."Put your clothes away!"


so dylan isn't using bad grammar, after all. he's giving a direct order.


Like I said, if Dylan sang it: "Lay, lady, lay...lay yourself across my big brass bed," then it would be OK.

Urth the difference isn't that profound, I really was an English teacher for about 6 years.  I'm just using the terms that are in the text books.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Davefish on February 28, 2005, 10:41:52 AM
Dang!  I've been sucked in by Dave's 1969 teaser.  What's it gonna be, me hearties?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:43:01 AM
Quote from: "Davefish"
Dang!  I've been sucked in by Dave's 1969 teaser.  What's it gonna be, me hearties?


hmm...if there is a prize involved...what would they give away?

jeff beck?
yes?
some motown?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Davefish on February 28, 2005, 10:45:49 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Davefish"
Dang!  I've been sucked in by Dave's 1969 teaser.  What's it gonna be, me hearties?


hmm...if there is a prize involved...what would they give away?

jeff beck?
yes?
some motown?

Indeed.  It's another week of ignoring the the 9:00 pop quiz since I don't have any desire to go to Great America and hear Collective Wimpiness.  Bleah.

EDIT:  This is NOT IT!!!
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 10:48:16 AM
we have to wait until eleven, don't we?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:48:41 AM
the 10@10 Bonus track -- a new interactive feature; you can vote on the website for the 11th song, and then Annalisa plays it.  Can't find the page with the choices, tho'
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: mshray on February 28, 2005, 10:50:50 AM
Quote from: "Davefish"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Davefish"
Dang!  I've been sucked in by Dave's 1969 teaser.  What's it gonna be, me hearties?


hmm...if there is a prize involved...what would they give away?

jeff beck?
yes?
some motown?

Indeed.  It's another week of ignoring the the 9:00 pop quiz since I don't have any desire to go to Great America and hear Collective Wimpiness.  Bleah.

EDIT:  This is NOT IT!!!


WTF!!

Finger 11 is about far from 1969 as we can get.

Regarding Spring Break, keep in mind that my building is across the street from the main entrance.  If anyone wants to go just for the rides or what not, we can meet up here to pre-function.  It has also been my experience that I can get tickets at the door just by asking nicely.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Davefish on February 28, 2005, 10:54:32 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
we have to wait until eleven, don't we?

Is that what he said?  Or is that just an "11 at 11" reference?  I'm a little slow today after being on vacation in Washington last week.  Was supposed to be playing in the snow, but there really wasn't any.  "Steer It Up" isn't from '69, is it?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on February 28, 2005, 11:02:06 AM
Quote from: "Davefish"
"Steer It Up" isn't from '69, is it?


nay. and there was no contest. maybe streamers can't hear it.

anyway, i can't wait any more. i'm going to find some chocolate.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Davefish on February 28, 2005, 11:09:02 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Davefish"
"Steer It Up" isn't from '69, is it?


nay. and there was no contest. maybe streamers can't hear it.

anyway, i can't wait any more. i'm going to find some chocolate.

Now we know.  Sort of.  It's the #2 song from 1969, which is good, since I believe the #1 song was "Sugar Sugar" by the Archies.  The question was (just now), what was the movie clip and who was in it?  The prize is a T-shirt.  Not gonna spoil my eligibility for that one.  Heh.  Anyway, it's Midnight Cowboy with Jon Voigt and Dustin Hoffman?  Right?
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 11:09:37 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Davefish"
"Steer It Up" isn't from '69, is it?


nay. and there was no contest. maybe streamers can't hear it.

anyway, i can't wait any more. i'm going to find some chocolate.


It's a trivia question: what was the movie clip and name the 2 main actors in the film.  the song is coming... after still more commercials. An interminable wait for a song and a T-shirt, if you ask me.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 11:12:41 AM
Sly, "Hot Fun..." Nice, but jeez, WAY too much vamping. If this is gonna be a daily thing, I opt out.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: urth on February 28, 2005, 12:31:20 PM
Quote from: "RGMike"

It's a trivia question: what was the movie clip and name the 2 main actors in the film.  the song is coming... after still more commercials. An interminable wait for a song and a T-shirt, if you ask me.


Sounds like they're trying to get 10@10 listeners to hang on and not tune away after the set is done. Could be that Annalisa's not holding onto the audience the way they'd like her to.  But they're going to have to come up with something better than a t-shirt, methinks.

Can't say I did anything to contradict that when I was filling out my Arbitron diary a few weeks ago--soon as 10@10 was done, I was pretty much done with KFOG for the day, at least til 10pm.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Gazoo on February 28, 2005, 02:05:50 PM
Quote from: "Davefish"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Davefish"
"Steer It Up" isn't from '69, is it?


nay. and there was no contest. maybe streamers can't hear it.

anyway, i can't wait any more. i'm going to find some chocolate.

Now we know.  Sort of.  It's the #2 song from 1969, which is good, since I believe the #1 song was "Sugar Sugar" by the Archies.  The question was (just now), what was the movie clip and who was in it?  The prize is a T-shirt.  Not gonna spoil my eligibility for that one.  Heh.  Anyway, it's Midnight Cowboy with Jon Voigt and Dustin Hoffman?  Right?

I missed this entire exchange b/c our internet connection went droppo.  Was the question "what was the overall #2 song of 1969"?  I would think it went (1) Aquarius / Let the Sun Shine In, (2) Sugar Sugar, (3) In the Year 2525 ...
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 02:37:23 PM
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Quote from: "Davefish"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "Davefish"
"Steer It Up" isn't from '69, is it?


nay. and there was no contest. maybe streamers can't hear it.

anyway, i can't wait any more. i'm going to find some chocolate.

Now we know.  Sort of.  It's the #2 song from 1969, which is good, since I believe the #1 song was "Sugar Sugar" by the Archies.  The question was (just now), what was the movie clip and who was in it?  The prize is a T-shirt.  Not gonna spoil my eligibility for that one.  Heh.  Anyway, it's Midnight Cowboy with Jon Voigt and Dustin Hoffman?  Right?

I missed this entire exchange b/c our internet connection went droppo.  Was the question "what was the overall #2 song of 1969"?  I would think it went (1) Aquarius / Let the Sun Shine In, (2) Sugar Sugar, (3) In the Year 2525 ...


no no no...

the trivia question was "what was the movie clip (Midnight Cowboy) and who were the two stars?"  Annalisa promo-ed the "bonus track" as a #2 song from '69, not THE #2 song.
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Alicat on February 28, 2005, 10:05:18 PM
I want 1969! They are replaying Friday's set!
 :shock:
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: RGMike on February 28, 2005, 10:06:59 PM
Quote from: "Alicat"
I want 1969! They are replaying Friday's set!
 :shock:


HA! beat me to it!  Somebody mis-programmed the computer. For shame!
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: Alicat on February 28, 2005, 10:07:48 PM
Your avatar is way too happy looking! I feel like Squidward.
Title: sorry to disagree
Post by: ggould on February 28, 2005, 10:16:33 PM
Quote from: "Gazoo"
WOS (and Worst Grammar of Set, too): "Lay Lady Lay."  Bobby, I have no idea what you were thinking; record-buyers of America, same.
But I remember the night it came out, and some guy just repeating over and over again "I threw it all away" in total awe.  Some of it is silly, but NS is well worth owning.
Title: funny you should say that
Post by: ggould on February 28, 2005, 10:18:46 PM
Quote from: "RGMike"
Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!
I have no idea what the thread is, but with all this hoopla about hiphop at school, I've been thinking of "Subterranean Homesick Blues" as if it was a rap song.  Not too hard to imagine Run DMC doing it.
Title: the official list
Post by: ggould on February 28, 2005, 10:28:33 PM
it was pretty hard to tell what the list is, what with all the grammar posting!  My BOS would have been split between the Who, Nilsson, and Tull.  Wouldn't it be grand if we could actually ever hear the original Fred Neil version of Everybody's Talkin'?

2/28/05 - Monday!  Time to visit...1969!!

Who - Pinball Wizard
Bob Dylan - Lay Lady Lay
Nilsson - Everybody's Talkin'
Fireballs - Long Green
Jethro Tull - Nothin' is Easy
Marvin Gaye - Too Busy Thinkin' 'Bout My Baby
The Frost - Mystery Man
Led Zeppelin - Babe, I'm Gonne Leave You (B-O-S!)
Blood, Sweat & Tears - And When I Die
Beatles - You Never Give Me Your Money

MOVIE:  Midnight Cowboy





 
Title: Re: funny you should say that
Post by: RGMike on March 01, 2005, 07:32:19 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "RGMike"
Guess that makes Bob the original rapper!
I have no idea what the thread is, but with all this hoopla about hiphop at school, I've been thinking of "Subterranean Homesick Blues" as if it was a rap song.  Not too hard to imagine Run DMC doing it.


Indeed, I am far from the first to call Dylan "the original rapper". About 10 years ago a studio group calling itself The Mystery Tramps did a rap version of "Like a Rolling Stone". There was some debate as to whether it was serious or satire (I thought it was hilarious).
Title: Mon 2/28/05 -- it's 1969! Yay!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 01, 2005, 08:12:39 AM
Quote from: "Alicat"
I want 1969! They are replaying Friday's set!
 :shock:


yeah, i stopped the recording don't know why. the oscar set would have been a good one to have, too. but i felt robbed.
Title: Re: the official list
Post by: princessofcairo on March 01, 2005, 08:13:19 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
Wouldn't it be grand if we could actually ever hear the original Fred Neil version of Everybody's Talkin'?
 


wouldn't it be grand if we could actually ever hear the original fred neil version of anything?

sigh...
Title: Re: the official list
Post by: ggould on March 01, 2005, 10:37:29 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "ggould"
Wouldn't it be grand if we could actually ever hear the original Fred Neil version of Everybody's Talkin'?
 


wouldn't it be grand if we could actually ever hear the original fred neil version of anything?

sigh...
No Shit Sherlock! :lol:  :lol:  :lol: