Author Topic: Marathoning, Sat 4/9/05  (Read 8326 times)

RGMike

  • The Core
  • Eight Miles High
  • *****
  • Posts: 79318
    • View Profile
Marathoning, Sat 4/9/05
« on: April 09, 2005, 07:49:28 AM »
Looks like they started on time for once; I just missed the first set so I don't know what it was (hoping it was '90).

Now they just played the back-announce only for "Strictly Instrumental" WTF???
You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round

RGMike

  • The Core
  • Eight Miles High
  • *****
  • Posts: 79318
    • View Profile
Marathoning, Sat 4/9/05
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2005, 08:45:13 AM »
OK, so apparently set # 1 was Instrumentals...  they just separated the backannounce and/or played it twice.  Just heard '83 and now we're getting '90 :-(

But Dave says '74 and '67 are still to come.
You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round

mshray

  • The Core
  • Transcendent Typist
  • *****
  • Posts: 15129
    • View Profile
Marathoning, Sat 4/9/05
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2005, 09:44:35 AM »
Quote from: "RGMike"
OK, so apparently set # 1 was Instrumentals...  they just separated the backannounce and/or played it twice.  Just heard '83 and now we're getting '90 :-(

But Dave says '74 and '67 are still to come.


Yep, '90 just concluded (the set I mostly missed this week) & so I hadn't heard Dave claim that a Foghead called in to say that he thought the early 90's were a 'musical wasteland, but this set is proving me wrong'.  This must have been a newbie listening to his first 1990 set, is the only thing I can think.

Psyched up for '74 & '67 coming last, hopefully Urth is up & at 'em!
"Music is the Earth, People are the Flowers, and I am the Hose."

--Carlos Santana, 2010

RGMike

  • The Core
  • Eight Miles High
  • *****
  • Posts: 79318
    • View Profile
Marathoning, Sat 4/9/05
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2005, 09:49:39 AM »
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "RGMike"
OK, so apparently set # 1 was Instrumentals...  they just separated the backannounce and/or played it twice.  Just heard '83 and now we're getting '90 :-(

But Dave says '74 and '67 are still to come.


Yep, '90 just concluded (the set I mostly missed this week) & so I hadn't heard Dave claim that a Foghead called in to say that he thought the early 90's were a 'musical wasteland, but this set is proving me wrong'.  This must have been a newbie listening to his first 1990 set, is the only thing I can think.

Psyched up for '74 & '67 coming last, hopefully Urth is up & at 'em!


That Foghead meant to say "Dave's early '90s sets are a musical wasteland"... :lol:
You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round

ggould

  • Administrator
  • Master Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 9159
    • View Profile
    • http://www.ggould.com
Pure and Easy
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2005, 09:55:41 AM »
I've always preferred the Pete Townsend solo version of this song.
Don't stand in the way of LOVE!

RGMike

  • The Core
  • Eight Miles High
  • *****
  • Posts: 79318
    • View Profile
Re: Pure and Easy
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2005, 10:02:44 AM »
Quote from: "ggould"
I've always preferred the Pete Townsend solo version of this song.


indeed. I can't recall if Dave's ever played it.

"So, Miss Hearst... we'd like to know where you got the notion... to rob the bank (don't rob the bank baby), rob the bank."
You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round

ggould

  • Administrator
  • Master Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 9159
    • View Profile
    • http://www.ggould.com
is this the Genesis the hip people like?
« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2005, 10:04:22 AM »
It's pretty irritating to me.
Don't stand in the way of LOVE!

RGMike

  • The Core
  • Eight Miles High
  • *****
  • Posts: 79318
    • View Profile
Re: is this the Genesis the hip people like?
« Reply #7 on: April 09, 2005, 10:09:36 AM »
Quote from: "ggould"
It's pretty irritating to me.


indeed, "Genesis when they were good".  I generally like them in this period, but that weird sonic effect on his vocals is kinda annoying.
You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round

ggould

  • Administrator
  • Master Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 9159
    • View Profile
    • http://www.ggould.com
Have you ever seen a squonk's tears?
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2005, 10:22:05 AM »
I can't tell you how many years my circle of friend's tried to figure out that line.  I think it's spelled 'squonk' since I eventually bought a Steely
Dan songbook, although you can't trust these guys anyhoo!  Did it ever get explained?
Don't stand in the way of LOVE!

RGMike

  • The Core
  • Eight Miles High
  • *****
  • Posts: 79318
    • View Profile
Re: Have you ever seen a squonk's tears?
« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2005, 10:31:25 AM »
Quote from: "ggould"
I can't tell you how many years my circle of friend's tried to figure out that line.  I think it's spelled 'squonk' since I eventually bought a Steely
Dan songbook, although you can't trust these guys anyhoo!  Did it ever get explained?


interestingly, there's a Genesis connection ("Squonk" is a song on Trick of the Tail). But a squonk is a mythical creature:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/360/A855092
You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round

ggould

  • Administrator
  • Master Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 9159
    • View Profile
    • http://www.ggould.com
Re: Have you ever seen a squonk's tears?
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2005, 10:39:16 AM »
Quote from: "RGMike"
Quote from: "ggould"
I can't tell you how many years my circle of friend's tried to figure out that line.  I think it's spelled 'squonk' since I eventually bought a Steely
Dan songbook, although you can't trust these guys anyhoo!  Did it ever get explained?


interestingly, there's a Genesis connection ("Squonk" is a song on Trick of the Tail). But a squonk is a mythical creature:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/360/A855092
There you go!  I've always loved Jorge Luis Borges, and to find he might be involved in this odd chain is so cool!
Don't stand in the way of LOVE!

RGMike

  • The Core
  • Eight Miles High
  • *****
  • Posts: 79318
    • View Profile
Marathoning, Sat 4/9/05
« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2005, 10:50:33 AM »
"Let it all Hang Out" you Hombres!

I've said this before: this record sounds like Roger Miller channeling Dylan.
You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round

RGMike

  • The Core
  • Eight Miles High
  • *****
  • Posts: 79318
    • View Profile
Marathoning, Sat 4/9/05
« Reply #12 on: April 09, 2005, 11:01:12 AM »
'67! Saving the best for last, indeed.

and wrong year or no, the Producers montage may be the highlight of the month.
You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round

ggould

  • Administrator
  • Master Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 9159
    • View Profile
    • http://www.ggould.com
I Can See for Miles
« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2005, 11:07:23 AM »
I believe this was the song they did on the Smothers Brothers show, and did the whole destroying the instruments shtick at the end of the song.  I recall having my young mind blown at the time.
Don't stand in the way of LOVE!

urth

  • Moderator
  • Transcendent Typist
  • *****
  • Posts: 15274
    • View Profile
Marathoning, Sat 4/9/05
« Reply #14 on: April 09, 2005, 12:08:48 PM »
Quote from: "mshray"

Psyched up for '74 & '67 coming last, hopefully Urth is up & at 'em!


In a manner of speaking. Was awakened before 7 by starving felines, so when I got up to feed the little bastards, I turned on the recorder and went back to bed 'til the tag end of the '90 set (just about the time you made the above post, Mark). But when I was up starting things off, I listened to enough to know that the marathon hadn't started yet. So it would seem I got the entire marathon for a change (not that I plan on keeping all of it), which it appears was played in chronological order for a change.

Maybe the board op who works Saturday mornings finally got the memo about the later start time. <g>
Let's get right to it.