Wish I'd had access to this site when Pulp Fiction was first released:
http://www.runpee.com
(except their server appears to be down, or at least overloaded)
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/07/31/entertainment/e035710D71.DTL&tsp=1
funny you would cite that movie specifically. I have a love/hate relationship w Quentin Tarantino, and I didn't really like PF that much, the overwhelming hype attached to it prob skewed my opinion a bit at first, but not that much.
Glad to hear you say that -- I think
Reservoir Dogs is a better film than PF; it's a tight 105 mins (or so) and the combo of amazing dialogue and hair-raising violence was quite a slap in the face at the time. PF is good but too long (as is
Jackie Brown) and I coulda done without all the Bruce Willis stuff.
I remember seeing RDs and being blown away by the writing, then coming home and watching Siskel & Ebert who -- amazingly -- gave it thumbs down! And S&E were, in those days, constantly talking about how writing is everything! So it seems to me that a lot of critics went overboard about PF because they saw that this was a train that they'd missed and wanted to jump onboard before it was too late.
But tonight I saw
500 Days of Summer and boy is it wonderful. Funny, charming, great sndtk (Best Hall & Oates musical interlude EVAH!) and again I say: if Zooey Deschanel doesn't play Linda Ronstadt in a movie, and soon, it will be the saddest missed opportunity in ages. Knowing some of us as I do, I think the guys here will especially love it. Best flick in that genre since
Garden State. See it ASAP.