Author Topic: 2006 EMP Pop Conference  (Read 6161 times)

Gazoo

  • The Core
  • Transcendent Typist
  • *****
  • Posts: 15259
    • View Profile
2006 EMP Pop Conference
« on: October 27, 2005, 10:41:44 PM »
Let the collective brainstorming begin ...

---------------

Hi 2005 attendees,

 

Against all odds, we’re back! Please forward this announcement on to people who have never been to the Pop Conference. We rely on your endorsement and enthusiasm to spread the word about what a few hundred pop music obsessives can accomplish in a weekend.

 

Best,

Eric

 

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

“Ain’t That a Shame”: Loving Music in the Shadow of Doubt

 

The 2006 Experience Music Project Pop Conference

Seattle, WA,  April 27-30, 2006

 

What forces are at work when we like something we “shouldn't”? What role does shame, either shame succumbed to or shame resisted, play in the pleasure we as fans and interpreters take from the music we love? Is loving music passionately (collecting it, critiquing it, fashioning one’s identity around it) itself becoming a guilty pleasure, i.e. something increasingly rare and in need of explanation, something self-indulgent or questionable?  To what extent do these issues reveal hierarchies of taste, transformed subjectivities, the effect of politics on culture, or other lines of contestation permeating popular music?

For this year’s Pop Conference, we invite papers, panels, or other presentations on these topics. Related questions include but are not limited to:

--In what terms do “guilty pleasures” operate beyond the U.S. experience? How do different genres define the inappropriate?

--Who are the performers, the issues and the hidden pleasures, that you have wanted to write about but never dared, or who you loved and then forsook?

--What happens when you center your focus on “minor” histories?

--How do the desires for novelty and permanence, diaspora and roots, or for that matter extremity and conformity, play out against each other in music?

--Can we think in less whiggish and salutary ways about pop and progress, or how music functions in dark times?

--Does doubt affect the creation of musical works, and not only reception? What guilty pleasure do performers feel about their own social impact?

--How does technology and futurist rhetoric affect distinctions in pop fashion between the sublime and the ridiculous?

--What are the connections between pop shame and “passing”: sexual, racing, class, nationality?

The EMP Pop Conference first convened in Spring 2002 and is now entering its fifth year. The goal has always been to bring academics, writers, artists, fans, and other participants into an all-too-rare common discussion. Most presentations are of the 20 minute panel talk variety, but unorthodox suggestions are our favorite kind and we can support a wide range of technological experimentation.  Previous year’s conferences have resulted in the anthology This is Pop (Harvard, 2004), the current special issue of Popular Music (“Magic Moments”), and a second anthology that is under preparation. This year’s program committee includes Drew Daniel (Matmos), writer Jessica Hopper, Jason King (New York University), Michaelangelo Matos (Seattle Weekly), Ann Powers (Blender), David Sanjek (BMI), Philip Schuyler (University of Washington), and Karen Tongson (University of Southern California).

Proposals should be no more than 250 words, should be accompanied by a brief bio and full contact information, and are due January 16, 2006. Proposals are judged by liveliness of prose as much as pertinence of topic. Email them, as well as any questions about the conference, the theme, your topic, or the application process, to organizer Eric Weisbard at EricW@emplive.org. For more information on previous conferences, including a full range of participants and abstracts, go to: http://www.emplive.org/visit/education/popConf.asp
“The choir of children sing their song.  They've practiced all year long.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.”

Gazoo

  • The Core
  • Transcendent Typist
  • *****
  • Posts: 15259
    • View Profile
2006 EMP Pop Conference
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2005, 09:06:37 AM »
What I'm leaning toward on this:

"Why the Monkees Should Be in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame: 15 Reasons in 15 Minutes."

Part of my presentation, if accepted, will be to play Neil Young's solo on the Davy Jones-penned post-TV show track "You and I."

And I think I'm going with the Monkees instead of the Jefferson Starship for the "33 1/3" pitch: The JS would be more exciting and relatively uncharted territory, as rock journalism goes, but they're taking potential sales into account, and I simply think the Monkees will sell better.  Input and counterpoints appreciated, though.
“The choir of children sing their song.  They've practiced all year long.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.”

mshray

  • The Core
  • Transcendent Typist
  • *****
  • Posts: 15129
    • View Profile
2006 EMP Pop Conference
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2005, 09:37:17 AM »
My perception is that the Monkees are much more music that we 'shouldn't' love (based on radio airplay), and therefore much the better choice.
"Music is the Earth, People are the Flowers, and I am the Hose."

--Carlos Santana, 2010

Gazoo

  • The Core
  • Transcendent Typist
  • *****
  • Posts: 15259
    • View Profile
2006 EMP Pop Conference
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2006, 11:03:18 AM »
Thread revived b/c the full itinerary has been posted.  I present on Friday, April 28.

****************************************

Ain't That a Shame: Loving Music in the Shadow of Doubt
The 2006 Pop Conference at Experience Music Project
Seattle, Washington
April 27 - April 30

 
THURSDAY, APRIL 27
7 - 8: 30 pm

* Love in the Shadows: A Conversation with Stephin Merritt
Fellow Magnetic Fields member LD Beghtol and Drew Daniel of Matmos talk
with the man behind 69 Love Songs and other revisionist masterstrokes about
queering the pop song and bubblegumming the art song. Moderated by Ann
Powers.

 
FRIDAY, APRIL 28
9 - 10: 45 am

* Disco Barbie
ERIC LOTT, "My Streisand Problem--and Hers"
ALICE ECHOLS, "The Way You Do the Things You Do"
DYLAN HICKS, "Men in Love: Barbra Streisand, Barry Gibb, and the
Autobiographical Criticism of Doug Belknap"
WILL STRAW, "Disco After Expo"

* Hip-Hop at the Crossroads
SHANESHA R.F. BROOKS, "Chilling Thrills: The Spirituality and Religiosity
of Hip-Hop Music"
ALI NEFF, "True Blues Ain't No New News: Tuning in to Folk Freestyle
Hip-Hop at the Crossroads of the Contemporary Mississippi Delta"
NEEL AHUJA, "Fatlip Cruises Crenshaw, Shah Rukh Khan Raps in Queens: The
Importance of Queer Masculinities in Hip Hop's Global Scene"
JOYCELYN WILSON, "Snap ya fangaz, do da step!: Southern Hip-Hop, Snap
Music, and the Rise of a New Dance Craze"

* People Watching
PETER DOYLE, "Living Large: The Field Recording, the Mug Shot, and the
Early 20th Century Mediascape"
RONALD COHEN, "Why Jews Have Been Attracted to American Folk Music"
YUVAL TAYLOR, "Blues Tourists: Condescension and the Blues Revival
DREW DANIEL, "How to Sing Along with Sweet Home Alabama"


11 am - 12:45 pm

* Rock & Roll Double-Consciousness
RJ SMITH, "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a White Man"
KEN EMERSON, "Minstrelsy on the Mersey"
DEVIN MCKINNEY, "Black Girl in a White Boy's Body"
NATE PATRIN, "I Wonder Who Taught Her How to Talk Like That: The Soul
Aspirations of Mid-'70s Rock"

* Capital Offenses? Shame, Guilt and Cover Songs
DEBRA RAE COHEN, "Is that Cultural Capital in Your Pocket, or Are You Just
Glad to See Me?
MICHAEL COYLE, "Cultural Capital: Shameless Jazz Covers"
KEVIN J.H. DETTMAR, "Shame and Cult Capital: U2 in the 1990s"

* TV Personalities
JOSEPH MCCOMBS, "10 Reasons Why the Monkees Should Be in the Rock and Roll
Hall of Fame"

STEVEN ROSEN, "Tiny Tim: The Harry Smith of Adult-Standard Singers"
GLENN DIXON, "Boldly Gone: A Personal Trek into the Shameless, Sincere
Music of Leonard Nimoy"
LIZZIE EHRENHALT, "Truly Outrageous: Towards a Defense of Jem & the
Holograms"


Lunch Session: 1 - 1:50 PM

* New Orleans Trickbag:  A Musical Remembrance in Film
Curated by Bruce Raeburn, Hogan Jazz Archive, Tulane University
Clips include a spiritual church ring shout attending a mass baptism
(1931), Kid Ory's "Creole Song" (1956), a brass band funeral with Dejan's
Olympia Brass Band (1966), a March of Time recreation of the first jazz
recording session with the Original Dixieland Jazz Band (1937), a Zulu
Parade with the Eureka Brass Band (1929), and field tapes of the Black
Eagles Mardi Gras Indian tribe (1997).


2 - 3:45 PM

* Mind/Body
GEETA DAYAL, "Shame on the Brain: Music, Guilty Pleasures, and Cognition"
SUSAN RAEBURN, "The Ring of Fire: Shame, Fame, and Rock & Roll"
JAMES HANNAHAM, "Schizophonic: Mentally Hill Singer-Songwriters and Their
Public"
TIM LAWRENCE, "Go Bang: Some Queer Songs About Masturbation and Orgasm"

* Bad Subjects
CHARLIE BERTSCH, "From Pleasure to Power: Confessing One's Lack of
Ignorance"
MICHAELANGELO MATOS, "A Double History of the Supremes' 'Love Child'"
ERIC WEISBARD, "For the Love of You: The Isley Brothers as Pop
Unmentionables
CARL WILSON, "Touch Me, Celine: A Dionysee or, Poptimism Versus the Guilty
Displeasure"

*Feeling It
ERIKA MONTENEGRO, "A Reluctant Academic Becomes a Fan: Intimacy and the
Fetishization of Absence in Fan Letters"
JOON OLUCHI LEE, "The Voice of Love: Grunge Femininity"
MAIREAD CASE, "I Went to Yr Concert & I Didn't Feel Anything: Women's
Liberation Rock, Le Tigre, and the Performed Ideal"


4 - 5: 45 PM

* Aural Correctness
BAZ DREISINGER, "Should Babylon Release the Cure? True Reflections on
Loving a Reggae-Star Rapist"
ROBERT CHRISTGAU, "Life Is Not Nothing but Bitches and Money: Enjoying
Gangsta, Crunk, Trap Music, and Other Popular Music Subgenres"
CHRISTY TURNER, "Hurts So Good: Guilty Pleasures, Black Feminism, and
Hip-Hop"
SEAN FENNESSEY, "What Happened to That Boy: Cutting Drugs, Deals, and a Dad
Complex"

* Guilt Rock
JOSH LANGHOFF, "Carman's 'A Little Bit More Conviction' as Guilt Rock"
JUSTIN MOYER, "Doing It Yourself--Sort Of: Funny Money and Trustafarian
Guilt in Punk Culture"
MAURA JOHNSTON, "No Fat Chicks? Weight and Rebellion During a Hard-Rock
Adolescence"
BRIAN GOEDDE, "Karaoke Sex"

* Lounge and Muzak
KEIR KEIGHTLEY, "If History Is Written by the Victors, Then Who Won? Boomer
Historiography Versus the Lounge Revival"
JESSICA WOOD, "Harpsichord Lounge: Representations of History in Postwar
Pop, 1950-1975"
JENTERY SAYERS, "Punk Muzak? Royally Scammed Into Steely Dan Fandom and
Smooth Rock"
MICHAEL DADDINO, "How Not to Defend Muzak"



SATURDAY, APRIL 29
9 - 10: 45 AM

* Whiteness Studies
JODY ROSEN, "Ragtime and Its Kings: The Case of Joplin vs. Berlin"
ELIJAH WALD, "Louis Armstrong Loves Guy Lombardo!"
BRUCE RAEBURN, "'That Ain't No Creole, It's A . . . !': Masquerade,
Marketing, and Transgression Against the Color Line in New Orleans Jazz"
TOM SMUCKER, "Horrifying Whiteness: Lawrence Welk and the Carpenters"

* Listening Closets
SARA JAFFE, "Farther From Fine: Coming Out Against the Indigo Girls"
SARA MARCUS, "Oh No Don't Close Your Eeeyyyes, or, Thoughts Regarding
Reconciliation with Reject Music from Homo High"
KARA JESELLA AND MARISA MELTZER, "Cute Band Alert: Sassy Magazine and the
New Teen Sex Object"

* Altered Images
THOM SWISS, "Ways of Looking: Portraits of Pop Musicians"
CYNTHIA FUCHS, "'All Over the floor': Selling Lindsay Lohan"
COURTNEY YOUNG, "Gwen Stefani is the new Dracula and Beyonce makes a great
Ghost: The Shame of Appropriation and 'Passing' as Attributes to the
Success of Gwen Stefani and Beyonce Knowles"
MARK GILLESPIE, "Another Darkchild Classic: The Role of Forgery in Shaping
Producer Rodney Jerkins' Sonic Signature"
 

11 AM - 12:45 PM

* Black Composers
ALEX ROSS, "Black Beethoven: The African American Classical Composer"
JOE SCHLOSS, "Sunday Morning I Forgot My Prayer: Guilt, Signifying, and the
Gospel Nihilism of Sly Stone"
JANET SARBANES, "Swashbucklers of Agitproptic Burnbabydom: George Clinton
and the Radical Poetics of P-Funk"
CECIL BROWN, "Richard Pryor, Music, and the Guilty Pleasure of Mick
Jagger's 'Some Girls'"

* Other People's Misery
DAVID THOMAS, "Morphic Resonance, Siberian Rock Bands, and the Brotherhood
of the Unknown"
BRANA MIJATOVIC, "Guilty Pleasures of Parody: Appropriate and Inappropriate
in the Music of a Balkan Rock Musician"
SETH SANDERS, "Tomorrow's Outsider Art--Today! (If You Want Blood, You've
Got It)"
DAVID SANJEK, "Rubbernecking at the Record Hop: The Lonesome Sound of Jimmy
Donley"

* Timbre!
MICA HILSON, "Squeak of the New Wave Woman"
REGINALD JACKSON, "Toward Humility in Microtones: Styling Shame Through
Slide Guitar"
DAVE TOMPKINS, "The Invertebrate History of Bass"
ALEXANDRA VAZQUEZ, "The Shrill Kill Cult: Deep Vocal Currents from Tona la
Negra to Ivy Queen"

Lunch Session: 1 - 1:50 pm

* Sin Verguenza: A Conversation with El Vez and Joe Santiago:
Conducted by MICHELLE HABELL-PALLAN and MARISOL BERRIOS-MIRANDA

 
2 - 3:45 PM

* Let's Call it Art
DAVID GRUBBS, "John Cage, Recording Artist"
SCOTT SAUL, "Crosseyed and Painless: Talking Heads and the Ouch of the
Ordinary"
ANN POWERS, "My Big Hair Hides Big Balls: Ultrafemme Drag from Artemisia to
Kate Bush"
DAPHNE CARR, "Poo Pooing Pop's Poseurs: Anxiously Analyzing the
Artschoolers"

* Cringeworthy
KURT REIGHLEY, "Up & Down with the Hi-Lo's"
TOM KIPP, "Kim Fowley's Outrageous: The Plan 9 From Outer Space of Rock
Albums!"
WERNER TRIESCHMANN, "Aural Velveeta: Dan Fogelberg's 'Longer'"
BRIAN RAFERTY, "Take a Look at Me Now: Phil Collins and the Great
Generational Divide"

* Girl Groups And Yacht Rockers: Male Sexuality and Its Discontents
CRAIG WERNER, Introduction and Chair
HEATHER STUR, "Nobody Knows What's Goin' on in My Mind: The Girls Tell the
Story"
MICHAEL CEPRESS, "Pink Taffeta Gowns: Girl Groups and the Iconography of
Sexual Identity"
LEAH MIRAKHOR, "What a Fool Believes: The Enduring Popularity of Yacht
Rock"
CHARLES HUGHES, "From Little Eva to Lil Kim: Girl Groups in the Modern Mix"


4 - 5: 45 PM

* Bends in the Fabric
ANTHONY MILLER, "Rock History as a Novel, the Rock Novel as History"
KANDIA CRAZY HORSE, "Electric Skychurch: The Wax Poetics of Rock Opera as
Social and Spiritual Commentary"
MIKE MCGONIGAL, "The Space Cowboy Vocoder Disco String Glories of Electric
Light Orchestra's Out of the Blue"
GREIL MARCUS, "Shame, Shame, Shame: Songs as Commercials"

* Guilt to Go Around
JOSHUA ALSTON, "Nickelback Appreciation Syndrome: How Shame Becomes Pride
Across the Racial Divide"
JALYLAH BURRELL, "Has Andre 3000 Lost His Accent? Racial Exceptionalism and
the Black Pop Landscape"
TYINA STEPTOE, "Confessions of a Black Dixie Chick"
JABALI STEWART, "Fearless Vampire Killers Unite: Authenticity,Black Punk,
and Cultural Warfare"

* Life of the Party
CHRISTINE BACAREZA BALANCE, "Guilty Pleasures: The Affective Charge of
Karaoke"
YUKA HASEGAWA, "Practices of Fandom and Connecting 'Japanese' in a Social
Networking Website Mixi"
MARIA TESSA SCIARRINO, "Lost in Translation: Musical Selection in Figure
Skating"
HOPE MUNRO SMITH, "What Happens in the Party Stays in the Party: Exploring
the Guilty Pleasures in Caribbean Popular Music"
Chair: Karen Tongsen


SUNDAY, APRIL 30
9 - 10:45 AM

* Critical Embarassment
MATT BRENNAN, "Comparing the Shaming of Jazz and Rhythm & Blues in Music
Criticism"
J.D. CONSIDINE, "My J-Pop Problem--and Yours"
RANDALL ROBERTS, "Dave Marsh-ing My Mellow: The Rolling Stone Record Guide
and the Creation of the Canon"
TIM QUIRK, "How to Write About Music You Hate"

* Shame Difference: The Racial and Sexual Politics of Failure
KARA ATTREP, "Shaming the Sixties: Popular Music in Advertising"
KATHERINE MEIZEL, "'Loser Chic' and the Celebration of Failure in American
Idol"
ROB WALLACE, "Angels and Demons at Play: Some Case Studies in Free Jazz and
Race"
ELIZABETH FREUDENTHAL, "The Rock and Roll Morality of Richard Hell's
'Plan'"
 
11 AM - 12:45 PM

* Dancing with the Architecture
DOUGLAS WOLK, "The Complete and Utter History of the Numa Numa Dance"
MATT CORWINE, "Super Mario Jams"
NORIKO MANABE, "Ring My Bell: The Impact of Cell Phone Technologies on the
Japanese Music Market"
MARC PERLMAN,  "Intense Joy and Intense Shame: Dealing with the Ambivalence
of File-Sharing"
Chair: Michaelangelo Matos

* Music in Dark Times
JAMES REVELL CARR, "The Cruel Men Were All to Blame: Shaming White Collar
Criminals in American Disaster Ballads"
SARAH DOUGHER, "Where I Come From a Lot of Front Porch Pickin':
Internalizing the Patriotic Country Song"
STU SHERMAN, "Life During Wartime: Kosovo's Dissonant Landscape"
“The choir of children sing their song.  They've practiced all year long.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.”

RGMike

  • The Core
  • Eight Miles High
  • *****
  • Posts: 79493
    • View Profile
2006 EMP Pop Conference
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2006, 11:47:15 AM »
Quote from: "Gazoo"
RONALD COHEN, "Why Jews Have Been Attracted to American Folk Music"


paging Matisyahu!

and... TWO panels on Streisand?

Christgau on how to enjoy Crunk should be, er, interesting.
You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round

ggould

  • Administrator
  • Master Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 9160
    • View Profile
    • http://www.ggould.com
definition of crunk
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2006, 12:14:59 PM »
Quote from: "RGMike"
Christgau on how to enjoy Crunk should be, er, interesting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crunk
Don't stand in the way of LOVE!

Gazoo

  • The Core
  • Transcendent Typist
  • *****
  • Posts: 15259
    • View Profile
The Draft: Long Post (Do I Have to Do This All Over Again?)
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2006, 06:34:35 AM »
I deleted the draft I posted here b/c the condensed version that I delivered proved to be much better.  I'll post the revision from home tonight, if anyone's interested.

But for now I'll tell y'all that (humble mumble) I was a hit this weekend.  The Monkees paper was very well received, and my decision to show a clip from the little-seen "33 1/3 Revolutions Per Monkee" special and the Frank Zappa segment in their Head movie proved very successful.  Got plenty of laughs during the talk and plenty of kind comments in the days afterward.

And perhaps more interestingly to y'alls, it turns out that Greil Marcus -- author of Like a Rolling Stone, Mystery Train, and so many other great rock tomes -- is a huge 10@10 fan.  He was delivering a speech on songs in advertising, and went on an extended and rather gushing tangent about Dave and Don and the 10@10 concept . . . including delivering the "10 Great Songs From One Great Year" tagline in his best radio voice.  I oughta tell Dave about this; is it better to reach him at davemocal@aol.com or dmorey@kfog.com?

Hope you all had lovely weekends and that some of you are having lovely birthdays.  With this big stone off my shoulders I'll be able to rejoin the convos here soon.  Toodles!
“The choir of children sing their song.  They've practiced all year long.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.”

Gazoo

  • The Core
  • Transcendent Typist
  • *****
  • Posts: 15259
    • View Profile
2006 EMP Pop Conference
« Reply #7 on: May 01, 2006, 07:19:46 AM »
[ bump ]  (Since I edited a post instead of creating a new one, it didn't move back to the top of the queue.)
“The choir of children sing their song.  They've practiced all year long.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.”

mshray

  • The Core
  • Transcendent Typist
  • *****
  • Posts: 15129
    • View Profile
Re: The Draft: Long Post (Do I Have to Do This All Over Agai
« Reply #8 on: May 01, 2006, 08:20:02 AM »
Quote from: "Gazoo"
I deleted the draft I posted here b/c the condensed version that I delivered proved to be much better.  I'll post the revision from home tonight, if anyone's interested.

But for now I'll tell y'all that (humble mumble) I was a hit this weekend.  The Monkees paper was very well received, and my decision to show a clip from the little-seen "33 1/3 Revolutions Per Monkee" special and the Frank Zappa segment in their Head movie proved very successful.  Got plenty of laughs during the talk and plenty of kind comments in the days afterward.

And perhaps more interestingly to y'alls, it turns out that Greil Marcus -- author of Like a Rolling Stone, Mystery Train, and so many other great rock tomes -- is a huge 10@10 fan.  He was delivering a speech on songs in advertising, and went on an extended and rather gushing tangent about Dave and Don and the 10@10 concept . . . including delivering the "10 Great Songs From One Great Year" tagline in his best radio voice.  I oughta tell Dave about this; is it better to reach him at davemocal@aol.com or dmorey@kfog.com?

Hope you all had lovely weekends and that some of you are having lovely birthdays.  With this big stone off my shoulders I'll be able to rejoin the convos here soon.  Toodles!


Congrats Gaz!  Really wish I could have reprised my attendance.  I for one would love to see the final version.

A suggestion for contacting Dave:  call the station between 9:20 & 9:50 PDT.  I have found Dave to be willing to chat for a good 5 minutes or so at that time of day, and then he'll tell you the best way to send further correspondence.
"Music is the Earth, People are the Flowers, and I am the Hose."

--Carlos Santana, 2010

Gazoo

  • The Core
  • Transcendent Typist
  • *****
  • Posts: 15259
    • View Profile
The paper, as presented on Friday, April 28, at the EMP
« Reply #9 on: May 04, 2006, 08:28:10 AM »
“10 Reasons Why the Monkees Should Be in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame”

A Paper Presented to the Experience Music Project 2006 Pop Conference

by Joseph McCombs

Friday, April 28, 2006
 
 
The Monkees played a significant and underappreciated role in the development of pop-rock music and its visual representation.  They also, through their prefabricated origins, raised vital questions of authenticity in the post-Beatles climate, in which bands were expected to be self-contained units that not only performed but wrote the material on their records.  As a result, they have been denied critical respect, acclaim that has also been withheld from comparable pop bands of the period like the Turtles, Tommy James, and Paul Revere & the Raiders.  Trash singles and bubblegummy pop-rock lack a place at the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame’s table.  Common are reviews like those from Paul Evans in the Rolling Stone Record Guide, who gives each of their initial nine studio albums between 1 ½ and 2 stars out of 5; and the All Music Guide’s Richie Unterberger, who while favorably describing the tunes disclaims, “It would be foolish to pretend, however, that they were a band of serious significance.”  My intent here is to pretend just that.

Why is this a big deal to me?  Well, I’m a huge Monkees fan, of the third-generation variety.  (That is, one who became a devotee during the band’s 1986 MTV-fueled resurgence.)  I own every single one of their CDs—even 1987’s abysmal post-comeback Pool It! and 1996’s utterly ignored reunion album Justus—and for a time, had entire episodes of their TV show committed to memory.  The Monkees did for me what The Golden Girls and Designing Women did for other gay men in my age demographic: They posited a family of choice, collecting people under one roof bound not so much by relations as by genuine camaraderie and shared goals.  Blood may be thicker than water, but fake blood is thicker than blood.

Moreover, the Monkees are casualties of a larger matter, the question of “Is it the singer or the song?”  For music industry historians to include the Monkees in the rock canon would be to legitimize the pop and the prefab, to acknowledge that it’s the song, not the singer, that makes for a musical memory; the product, not the process.  Few are willing to make such a concession to the trash-singles aesthetic, in which studio musicians and staff songwriters play as large and as legitimate a role in the creative process as the artist on the label.  That’s why I’ve compiled 10 reasons why the Monkees, who took the input from those musicians and songwriters and created great pop records, deserve to have their artistic contributions validated by being enshrined in the Rock Hall.

Reason #1: Their chart success.

Hey, I’m a chart guy.  And their charts read like this: three #1 singles, six Top 10s, 12 Top 40s (10 of which made it into the Top 20), and a total of 20 Hot 100 singles.  On the album charts, they were equally impressive, with four #1 LPs, including a self-titled debut whose 13 weeks at #1 remained a record for first releases until Men at Work’s Business as Usual in 1982. The band’s Billboard numbers compare very favorably to those of the recently inducted Blondie, who scored four #1s amid their eight Top 40 entries in a similar time span.

Also consider the time frame of those hits.  1967 is universally considered one of rock’s most vital and inspired years.  And competing with such legendary albums as Sgt. Pepper, Surrealistic Pillow, The Doors, The Who Sell Out, Are You Experienced?, and Forever Changes, not to mention with singles-oriented artists at their creative peaks like the Turtles and the Four Tops, the Monkees more than held their own.

Reason #2: The quality of the songs, even those that weren’t hits.

There are many who sensibly think that what’s not organic is not good to eat, and that the same goes for bands.  The inorganic Monkees defied logic, though, by arriving at a coherent sound despite having four very different musical backgrounds and not going through the normal vetting process that a developing band undergoes.  The Monkees’ sound, while sometimes derivative, added original elements to the period pop such as jangly pedal steel guitar, a distinctive ring that was a signature Mike Nesmith contribution to the band and was part of the prototype for what would soon be called “country rock.”  

The songs themselves appealed for all the right reasons: They were highly melodic, uplifting, enhanced by visual cues but not dependent upon them, and occasionally innovative, as on the improvised Moog swirls in “Daily Nightly” and the controlled chaos of “Randy Scouse Git.”  Billboard was especially generous to the early material, gushing: “All the excitement generated by the promotional campaign . . . is justified by this debut disk loaded with exciting teen dance beats.”  B-sides like “Words” and “The Girl I Knew Somewhere” were no less tuneful or hummable than their flipside counterparts.  Though lyrics were generally of secondary importance, behind the novelty of Peter Tork’s frayed delivery of “Your Auntie Grizelda” lay clever internal rhyming and relevant moralizing.  And the piano intro to “Daydream Believer,” played by Peter, remains one of the most memorable opening riffs ever.

The argument remains, though, that the Monkees were incidental to the songs, and I’d like to decenter that.  Before the singer-songwriter era, a talented songwriter without comely visual attributes had to be discovered by writing songs for others.  For example, Three Dog Night, the last of the non-writing hit rock bands, were instrumental in propelling the careers of Randy Newman, Laura Nyro, and Paul Williams in this fashion; and the Monkees—whose 1969 recording of “Someday Man” gave Williams his first chart hit—were even more important in this area, introducing Williams and Harry Nilsson to the pop world, turning Neil Diamond from a hack into a commodity, and giving Carole King one of her better outlets.

Reason #3: The many talents they helped foster and/or discover.

Thus we begin to see the Monkees’ impact as a way station for developing artists.  Much as the Buffalo Springfield, elected to the Hall despite being together only two years, are as much revered for the careers and projects they spawned as for the albums they released in their short lifespan, the Monkees warrant acknowledgement for their role as a launching pad for talent.

•   Diamond, who’d hit with “Cherry Cherry” by then but wasn’t established, had his first monster hits by authoring “I’m a Believer” and “A Little Bit Me, A Little Bit You” for the band.  
•   King, already considered a writer of contemporary standards, took advantage of this high-visibility outlet with some of her shinier gems; “Take a Giant Step,” “Sometime in the Morning,” and “Sweet Young Thing” are among the many standouts she had a hand in writing.  
•   Glen Campbell, as part of Hal Blaine’s Wrecking Crew, had a session gig playing lead guitar on “Mary, Mary” and other tracks before becoming a lineman for the county.
•   Tommy Boyce and Bobby Hart had written Jay and the Americans’ “Come a Little Bit Closer” and a few other charters, but their Monkees involvement on such smashes as “Last Train to Clarksville” and “(I’m Not Your) Steppin’ Stone” made them names and allowed them to launch their own career with the hits “I Wonder What She’s Doing Tonight” and “Alice Long.”  
•   Neil Young, newly successful with the Springfield, further cut his chops as a studio musician by lending a searing guitar solo to Davy Jones’s scathing “You and I,” while
•   Michael Martin Murphey, who ran calling “Wildfire” and had a series of C/W charters a few years later, scored his first songwriting breakthrough with the Nesmith vehicle “What Am I Doin’ Hangin’ ’Round?”  
•   Jack Nicholson was already a working actor but added “writer” and “producer” credits to his résumé with his work on the band’s sole film, Head.  
•   Jimi Hendrix toured with the Monkees in 1967 for a very short while in his quest for American exposure post-Monterey, a famously mismatched pairing that nevertheless introduced the Experience to broader swaths of America than he could have reached without them.  
•   Finally, later episodes of the lads’ TV series offered early glimpses of Charlie Smalls, who went on to write the songs for The Wiz, and doomed troubadour Tim Buckley, whose rendition of “Song to the Siren” on the show’s final episode is an unqualified and understated highlight.

That’s the short list of artists whose careers were aided and abetted by the Prefab Four—who may have been artificial, but at least had good taste.

Reason #4: Their standoff against Don Kirshner, the music prefabrication process, and indeed, the music industry.

The artifice of the Monkees didn’t just bother critics and music purists.  It bothered the boys themselves, leading to a showdown with music supervisor Don Kirshner, who’d assembled the studio musicians and staff songwriters responsible for much of the first two albums. Kirshner had been hired for expediency’s sake: They’d contracted for 32 episodes, requiring more songs than Boyce and Hart or any other in-house unit could have possibly composed in such a brief time; Donnie, on the other hand, had access to a stable of the best, Brill Building and beyond.  The Monkees, who’d been forbidden from playing the instruments on those early albums, rejected the puppet roles that they’d been assigned, in a confrontation with Kirshner and his executives that brought to light for many the machinations of the song factory.  VH1 referred to the showdown as “a high-stakes musical mutiny,” Nesmith threatening to quit the show and Kirshner ultimately being fired instead.  It was a defining moment in the Monkees’ history, one that could have dissolved them or made them the Curt Floods of the entertainment biz.  Instead, the boys were given the autonomy to write and perform nearly everything on their next album, a garage-rock classic called Headquarters.  A courageous stance, and punk as fuck.

Reason #5: Their vital innovations in music video.

It is true that, as Newsweek noted at the time, the Monkees were “direct videological descendants of the Beatles.”  The sitcom was heavily inspired by A Hard Day’s Night.  But the lads and their crew of directors and producers took the medium of TV to new places.  Rapid jump-cuts, fourth-wall-smearing nods to the camera, and inventive direction techniques gave the series a feel and a pace unprecedented on American television, a vibe soon after replicated by Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In for a more adult crowd.  More importantly, the show presented romp scenes and performance clips that presaged the music video we came to know and love.  Promotional clips were not completely new, but they achieved an aesthetic and a focus on The Monkees that would prove highly influential.

Years later, Nesmith took the aesthetic a few steps further, first with a series of videos called Popclips and then with a broader special that incorporated comedy skits as well as music, titled Elephant Parts.  Shortly thereafter, Music Television appeared—but without Nez and the Monkees, there’d have been no MTV; and as testament to his foresight, Nesmith won the first ever Video of the Year Grammy.

(The Monkees also did a little-known, but intriguing, hour-long musical show in April 1969.  Airing on NBC against the Oscars, 33 1/3 Revolutions Per Monkee attracted little attention then, and even less since.  I’d hoped to spend some time on it here, as it’s definitely something that can only be enjoyed in the shadow of doubt, but for lack of time will just move on and show the clips in the background.)

Reason #6: Their (OK, not so vital) innovations in music itself.

Before the band’s emergence, there were no such branches in rock’s family tree as “Bubblegum” and “Sunshine Pop.”  The former, a sound consciously invented in 1968 to appeal to youthful listeners while encoding adult themes for older ones, owes its livelihood to the desire to capitalize on Monkee success (in fact, “Sugar Sugar” was offered to the band years before the Archies were contrived).  Lester Bangs summarized the genre thusly: “The basic bubblegum sound could be described as the basic sound of rock & roll—minus the rage, fear, violence and anomie . . . Ladle on a bit of Beach Boys here and there, keep the ball rolling but let it bounce. . . . A calculated innocence, perhaps, but the wonderful irony was that it worked.”  It did work, and the Hall should recognize this.

The related sunshine-pop genre finds its origins also perhaps in the Beach Boys, with their Pet Sounds album, but the All Music Guide’s definition of the sound—“rich harmony vocals, lush orchestrations, and relentless good cheer”—describes the Monkees’ later recordings to a T.  These more complex records provided the crucial link between the Brill Building pop of the early ’60s and the psychedelic sunshine of the tail end of the decade, taking those professional lyrics and smart melodies and adding personal twists to them, like the use of the Moog synthesizer—Micky is said to have owned one of the first three in existence—on two tracks from their 1967 artistic peak, Pisces, Aquarius, Capricorn & Jones, Ltd. Other bands soon followed, but in this case, the Monkees were for once the leader.

They also led, courtesy of the forward-thinking Nesmith, in the development of the country-rock sound, alongside the Byrds and the Buffalo Springfield.  Some say the Flying Burrito Brothers, formed by two Byrds that had flown, created the style, but really, Nez preceded them, giving the group’s songs an identifiable twang.  He is sometimes cited as a solo artist for his offerings to the genre, but the Monkees should be given credit as well.  Few have done so, although David Cantwell and Bill Friskics-Warren, authors of 2003’s Heartaches by the Number: Country Music’s 500 Greatest Singles, did include “Last Train to Clarksville” in their list.

Michael Nesmith’s songwriting, besides pursuing the country-rock idiom when few others were, had a distinct maturity to it: He contemplated long-term relationships rather than high school crushes on such introspective ballads as “Nine Times Blue,” “While I Cry,” and a personal favorite, “Carlisle Wheeling.”

Reason #7: The amazingly pliable vocal and lyrical talents of Micky Dolenz.

Nez wasn’t the only Monkee with legitimate musical chops and ideas, though.  Before Sonny Bono invented rap with “My Best Friend’s Girl Is Out of Sight,” we had this astonishing vamp about drowning in the sea of love in 1967 from the underrated Mr. Dolenz:
“Floatindowntheriver/withasaturatedliver/andIwishIcouldforgiveher/
butIdobelieveshemeantit/whenshetoldmetoforgetit/andIbetshewillregretit/
whentheyfindmeinthemorningwetanddrowned/and word gets ’round/goin’ down.”  It’s a peak in their catalogue.

Dolenz showed his vocal flexibility there and elsewhere: He had a grand pop-sensible malleability that allowed him to go pseudo-punk on “Steppin’ Stone,” cheese-Louise on “I’m a Believer,” breezy commentator on “Pleasant Valley Sunday,” and restrained high-harmonizer on “Shades of Gray.”  In addition, he demonstrated a fine playfulness in his songwriting: “Randy Scouse Git,” which became a #2 hit in England under the alternate title “Alternate Title,” combined a vividly imagistic stream-of-consciousness lyric with tympani on the refrain and scatting on the bridge, while 1969’s “Mommy and Daddy” was an accusatory treatise on parental responsibility, coming from someone still seen as a teenybopper role model.  The released version was startling enough in its commentary on American adults’ treatment of Native Americans, pharmaceuticals, and the soldiers in Vietnam, but an unreleased take that surfaced several years later is downright seditious, Micky tackling the JFK conspiracy, suicide, pill-popping, and careless parenting, all in under two minutes, chanting gleefully at the close, “They’re all living a lie!”

I claimed in my abstract that Dolenz was “the best Carole King interpreter this side of Dusty Springfield,” which may have been hyperbolic, but it’s worth considering.  The aforementioned “Sometime in the Morning” is a gorgeous high-tenor effort, as are the high-water film tracks “Porpoise Song” and “As We Go Along,” the latter of which received a tasteful, if period-dated, treatment in Head.

Reason #8: They gave us Head.

It’s a stoner film, doubtless, but it’s a then rare example of artists critically examining their own roles in the entertainment/media machine.  Unlike the sitcom, the movie is content to take its time making its points, including its (few) jokes.  Largely self-absorbed and mostly unfunny, it’s nevertheless miles beyond your typical Elvis vehicle.  Where the Beatles giddily ran from their fans in A Hard Day’s Night, the Monkees opened their late-’68 film by running to a suicide leap off “one of the largest suspended-arch bridges in the world.”  Despite the randomness of many of its images and lines, the film is definitely about something: the boys’ efforts to get out of the box they perceived themselves personally and professionally trapped in, a box made literal and crucial to the film’s most effective scene—the closing, wherein their reprised jump off the bridge at first appears liberating, but soon reveals itself to simply have landed them back in their place, a crate being trucked off backstage along with the other props.

Head found the boys on a mission to do “adult” things: They make out with girls, shoot guns, smoke hookah, mouth off to waitresses, throw haymakers, and let éminence grise Frank Zappa give them shit, calling their music “pretty white.”  (Davy’s clever rejoinder: “Well, so am I, what can I tell you.”)  It’s an important document in the band’s history and in the history of artists responding to their public perception.

Reason #9: Their central role in defining “authenticity” in rock (and authenticating pop).

The Monkees were fully aware of their role in the larger debates of “authenticity” in rock music.  They knew that their records were largely trash singles, and continued to make them.  Trash-pop singles are valid!  To make a statement of inclusiveness with the Monkees can open the doors for appreciation of a broader section of the music spectrum.  The Rock & Roll Hall of Fame isn’t just rock & roll, despite its title: It’s R&B, punk, funk, folk, blues, and now with Black Sabbath, it’s heavy metal.  Yet pop music remains a bastard child where the Hall is concerned, and it will take an artist of the Monkees’ caliber and catalogue to legitimize and authenticate the genre in the Hall’s eyes.

Further, the complaints about them not playing their own instruments are a red herring: The Beach Boys and the Byrds used studio musicians on some of their best-loved recordings, and as Micky was fond of pointing out at the time, Sonny & Cher and Frank Sinatra and the artists on Motown didn’t play the instruments on their perfectly authentic records either.  The Monkees were the first to be called out on it, though, giving us a framework with which to deal with Milli Vanilli, Ashlee Simpson, and so many others.

Reason #10: The real purpose of the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame.

Finally, the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame isn’t just about musical talent or output, it’s about cumulative impact.  Just ask the Sex Pistols!  As the Hall’s own induction process declares: “Criteria include the influence and significance of the artist’s contributions to the development and perpetuation of rock and roll.”  The Monkees played a vital role in rock’s development: the careers they helped launch, the genres they helped popularize, the visual aesthetics they innovated.  Had they only played one of these three roles, they’d be a historical footnote, a pleasant memory.  But taken together, these purposes, along with the massive hits they had and the great records they made, show that their position in the pop-rock continuum was not an ephemeral blip, but rather a lasting mark.

As a wise friend once told me: “Rock ’n’ roll has always been a dialectic between art and commerce.  The Monkees were conceived as pure commerce, but the art was still within, and the guys struggled against high odds to bring it out.  Any rock band that manages to get a hit on the charts is a result of this dialectic, from Elvis to the Beatles to Nirvana.  It’s just that the particular circumstances of the Monkees throw it into sharp relief.  This is certainly worthy of being recognized by the Hall of Fame.”
“The choir of children sing their song.  They've practiced all year long.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.  Ding dong.”