10at10 Club

Main Discussion Area => KFOG's 10@10 => Topic started by: RGMike on March 06, 2013, 09:22:21 AM

Title: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: RGMike on March 06, 2013, 09:22:21 AM
I have to assume this is a '90s day, in which case see ya later.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's... ??
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 09:32:03 AM
Clues: Heidi Fleiss busted and John Wayne Bobbitt -- 1993
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's... ??
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 10:04:13 AM
TOTHK - U2 "Stay"
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's... ??
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 10:09:01 AM
Bruce Springsteen "Streets of Philadelphia"
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 10:13:53 AM
Bjork "Human Behaviour"
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: radical347 on March 06, 2013, 10:14:01 AM
I like tracks 1 & 2, but both are snoozy.  Plus Renee is going a little overboard with the AIDS-related song/clips, this is like the 3rd in the last week on 10@10.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: Davefish on March 06, 2013, 10:16:36 AM
Bjork "Human Behaviour"
Good tympani in this song, but overall an unpleasant experience. Can't shake the feeling that she's not singing in the same key as the accompaniment.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 10:18:44 AM
Big Head Todd & The Monsters "Bittersweet"
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 10:24:41 AM
The Story "So Much Mine"
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: Davefish on March 06, 2013, 10:27:17 AM
The Story "So Much Mine"
NTM, not bad. Very reminiscent of Lisa Loeb.

ETA: I see it's Jonatha Brook. I'm sure I've heard her before, but it's been a while.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: radical347 on March 06, 2013, 10:28:20 AM
This is one snoozy rarity I didn't need to hear
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 10:28:51 AM
UB40 "Higher Ground"
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: Davefish on March 06, 2013, 10:32:46 AM
UB40 "Higher Ground"
More in the snoozy rarity category.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 10:32:53 AM
The Breeders "Cannonball"
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: RGMike on March 06, 2013, 10:33:34 AM
Bjork "Human Behaviour"
Good tympani in this song, but overall an unpleasant experience. Can't shake the feeling that she's not singing in the same key as the accompaniment.

Bjork Sjucks.  Glad I passed on this one.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: urth on March 06, 2013, 10:33:54 AM
UB40 "Higher Ground"

This set is taking on a very proto-AAA tone. DC's hand in this is apparent. ZZZZZZzzzzz.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: Here'sToYa! on March 06, 2013, 10:33:59 AM
I like tracks 1 & 2, but both are snoozy.  Plus Renee is going a little overboard with the AIDS-related song/clips, this is like the 3rd in the last week on 10@10.

I've already mentioned this a few times, but the obligatory Springsteen track is driving me nuts. I see it as a symptom of the safe approach to 10@10 that has greatly compromised the show. "Everybody loves Bruce!" so they can't go wrong playing him. 10@10 was never edgy per se, but it did take risks relative to the commercial landscape in which it lived. Playing Bruce every time they hit a year in which he released a track is so predictable, it's boring regardless of the song picked.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: Davefish on March 06, 2013, 10:34:05 AM
The Breeders "Cannonball"
Yay! BOS.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 10:36:09 AM
Tears For Fears "Break It Down Again"
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: urth on March 06, 2013, 10:42:58 AM
The Breeders "Cannonball"
Yay! BOS.

Brief respite there from the AAA stuff, but now we're right back in it.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: radical347 on March 06, 2013, 10:43:55 AM
Melissa Etheridge: I'm not the only LN
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 10:44:09 AM
Melissa Etheridge "I'm The Only One"
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 10:46:23 AM
Mick Jagger with Lenny Kravitz covering Bill Withers' "Use Me"
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: RGMike on March 06, 2013, 10:48:20 AM
Mick Jagger covering Bill Withers' "Use Me"

Wow, I remember KFOG playing that in '93 and not a whole lot since.  An interesting rarity.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: radical347 on March 06, 2013, 10:53:22 AM
Rarity wise this set was fine.  But it lacked a certain 'je ne sais quoi'.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: CapnJack on March 06, 2013, 10:57:05 AM
Renee sez BOS goes to Tears For Fears.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: RGMike on March 06, 2013, 11:06:02 AM
1. U2 - Stay (Faraway, So Close!)
2. Bruce Springsteen - Streets of Philadelphia
(News: Don't Ask, Don't Tell)
3. Bjork - Human Behavior
4. Big Head Todd & The Monsters - Bittersweet
(News: John Wayne Bobbit)
5. The Story - So Much Mine
6. UB40 - Higher Ground
7. The Breeders - Cannonball
8. Tears For Fears - Break It Down Again
(Movie: Short Cuts)
9. Melissa Etheridge - I'm The Only One
10. Mick Jagger - Use Me
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: RGMike on March 06, 2013, 11:08:37 AM
I like tracks 1 & 2, but both are snoozy.  Plus Renee is going a little overboard with the AIDS-related song/clips, this is like the 3rd in the last week on 10@10.

I've already mentioned this a few times, but the obligatory Springsteen track is driving me nuts. I see it as a symptom of the safe approach to 10@10 that has greatly compromised the show. "Everybody loves Bruce!" so they can't go wrong playing him. 10@10 was never edgy per se, but it did take risks relative to the commercial landscape in which it lived. Playing Bruce every time they hit a year in which he released a track is so predictable, it's boring regardless of the song picked.

Indeed, and also true of U2, I'd say.  It's like Beatles and/or Stones in '60s sets. Dave used to do it with ELO as well. 
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: Big Fingers McGee on March 06, 2013, 08:14:04 PM
I like tracks 1 & 2, but both are snoozy.  Plus Renee is going a little overboard with the AIDS-related song/clips, this is like the 3rd in the last week on 10@10.

I've already mentioned this a few times, but the obligatory Springsteen track is driving me nuts. I see it as a symptom of the safe approach to 10@10 that has greatly compromised the show. "Everybody loves Bruce!" so they can't go wrong playing him. 10@10 was never edgy per se, but it did take risks relative to the commercial landscape in which it lived. Playing Bruce every time they hit a year in which he released a track is so predictable, it's boring regardless of the song picked.

So, THAT's why you didn't join the G-snipes. BTW, I agree with you - He's great and all that yada yada yada but frankly I don't need to hear him for about five years.

Also, the "Play Springsteen whenever it applies" can be filed under "pandering".
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: Big Fingers McGee on March 06, 2013, 08:24:13 PM
Good/Necessary:
1. A/A-
2. B/F
3. B/C
4. D/F
5. B/A
6. B/B
7. A/C
8. B/D
9. C/D
10. B/B
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: RGMike on March 07, 2013, 07:40:05 AM
I like tracks 1 & 2, but both are snoozy.  Plus Renee is going a little overboard with the AIDS-related song/clips, this is like the 3rd in the last week on 10@10.

I've already mentioned this a few times, but the obligatory Springsteen track is driving me nuts. I see it as a symptom of the safe approach to 10@10 that has greatly compromised the show. "Everybody loves Bruce!" so they can't go wrong playing him. 10@10 was never edgy per se, but it did take risks relative to the commercial landscape in which it lived. Playing Bruce every time they hit a year in which he released a track is so predictable, it's boring regardless of the song picked.

So, THAT's why you didn't join the G-snipes. BTW, I agree with you - He's great and all that yada yada yada but frankly I don't need to hear him for about five years.

Also, the "Play Springsteen whenever it applies" can be filed under "pandering".

see also: AL and the Foos.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: Lightnin' Rod on March 07, 2013, 09:48:44 AM
I like tracks 1 & 2, but both are snoozy.  Plus Renee is going a little overboard with the AIDS-related song/clips, this is like the 3rd in the last week on 10@10.

I've already mentioned this a few times, but the obligatory Springsteen track is driving me nuts. I see it as a symptom of the safe approach to 10@10 that has greatly compromised the show. "Everybody loves Bruce!" so they can't go wrong playing him. 10@10 was never edgy per se, but it did take risks relative to the commercial landscape in which it lived. Playing Bruce every time they hit a year in which he released a track is so predictable, it's boring regardless of the song picked.

So, THAT's why you didn't join the G-snipes. BTW, I agree with you - He's great and all that yada yada yada but frankly I don't need to hear him for about five years.

Also, the "Play Springsteen whenever it applies" can be filed under "pandering".

Queue up the Alanis.  If she doesn't do the things you want her to (more in social media, more obscurities, more variety, less repitition) it's pandering, but if she takes your criticism to heart, it's what?  Enlightenment?

It's all pandering.  That's how you please your audience.  That's how you improve ratings.
Title: Re: 6 Mar 2013: it's...1993
Post by: Here'sToYa! on March 08, 2013, 10:24:02 AM
I like tracks 1 & 2, but both are snoozy.  Plus Renee is going a little overboard with the AIDS-related song/clips, this is like the 3rd in the last week on 10@10.

I've already mentioned this a few times, but the obligatory Springsteen track is driving me nuts. I see it as a symptom of the safe approach to 10@10 that has greatly compromised the show. "Everybody loves Bruce!" so they can't go wrong playing him. 10@10 was never edgy per se, but it did take risks relative to the commercial landscape in which it lived. Playing Bruce every time they hit a year in which he released a track is so predictable, it's boring regardless of the song picked.

So, THAT's why you didn't join the G-snipes. BTW, I agree with you - He's great and all that yada yada yada but frankly I don't need to hear him for about five years.

Also, the "Play Springsteen whenever it applies" can be filed under "pandering".

see also: AL and the Foos.

Yes, the Dave Grohl crush was equally annoying.