10at10 Club

Main Discussion Area => KFOG's 10@10 => Topic started by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 09:56:29 AM

Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 09:56:29 AM
I sent Dave an email on behalf of my brother Chris' 40th birthday today.

Dave just said, "a rare return to ancient history".
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: RGMike on March 18, 2005, 09:58:15 AM
DAMN!

Damndamndamndamndamn.

I'll just have to wait until tonite :-(
Title: Re: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 09:59:25 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
I sent Dave an email on behalf of my brother Chris' 40th birthday today.

Dave just said, "a rare return to ancient history".


I mentioned that Chris matriculated to Stanford in '83 and was listening for the 1st KFOG birthday so he's nearly a charter Foghead (not sure if it's really true, but it could be).  I then credited him with turning my on to KFOG & 10@10 (both true).

I figured the timing was exactly right, a Friday after a themed set.
Title: Re: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 09:59:34 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
I sent Dave an email on behalf of my brother Chris' 40th birthday today.

Dave just said, "a rare return to ancient history".


hey, tell chris i said hello and happy birthday! this is the same brother from our last gathering, yes?
Title: Re: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:02:00 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
I sent Dave an email on behalf of my brother Chris' 40th birthday today.


you're a good man, charlie brown.
Title: Re: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:02:53 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "mshray"
I sent Dave an email on behalf of my brother Chris' 40th birthday today.

Dave just said, "a rare return to ancient history".


hey, tell chris i said hello and happy birthday! this is the same brother from our last gathering, yes?


And thank him for letting us leverage his birthday into a really really old set!!

I think I'm home tonight--gotta get this 'un archived fer sure.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 10:02:57 AM
Quote from: "RGMike"
DAMN!

Damndamndamndamndamn.

I'll just have to wait until tonite :-(


I'm already taping on my boombox, but it's not the highest quality perhaps.
Title: Liar Liar, The Castaways!
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:03:08 AM
appearing at the Cow Palace, produced by Big Daddy Tom Donahue!
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Davefish on March 18, 2005, 10:04:21 AM
Great stuff so far with "Liar Liar" and "Shakin' All Over".  What would you say are the chances that we'll hear "Like a Rolling Stone" and "Satisfaction" , perhaps even consecutively?
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Alicat on March 18, 2005, 10:04:24 AM
Very enjoyable so far. Happy Birthday Chris!!!
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:04:53 AM
Hey Mark, was that you that called in with the Henry Mancini story this morning? The guy said he used to be a limo driver in SoCal, so it had your fingerprints all over it.
Title: for the sake of a list
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:05:43 AM
I presume this was Eddy Cochran's "Shakin' All Over"
Title: Fontella Bass, Rescue Me
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:06:18 AM
cookin' bubby bass line!
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 10:06:36 AM
Quote from: "urth"
Hey Mark, was that you that called in with the Henry Mancini story this morning? The guy said he used to be a limo driver in SoCal, so it had your fingerprints all over it.


yep, see my recap in the Drive's 10@10 from this morning.

and yes, this is the same brother who was at the October gathering.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Gazoo on March 18, 2005, 10:07:59 AM
Yeah, it was Mshray -- see the Drive thread for the deets.

Missed "Liar, Liar" to my dismay.  Now getting a song I thought was Aretha for *years*.

And yes, "Rolling Stone" and "Satisfaction" are cinches, as is something from (yay) the Beatles, probably either "Ticket to Ride" or "Day Tripper."  I'm betting the former.  Also betting that we hear from the DC5, maybe "Any Way You Want It."  I just hope it's not "Because," one of the worst songs ever written.
Title: Yardbirds, Heart Full of Soul
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:09:14 AM
I get so confused, Jeff Beck and/or Jimmy Page?
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Gazoo on March 18, 2005, 10:09:38 AM
BOS to "Heart Full O' Soul."  What a great riff.  And the echo on the backing vox is a nice touch.
Title: Re: Yardbirds, Heart Full of Soul
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:09:41 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
I get so confused, Jeff Beck and/or Jimmy Page?
or Eric?
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:10:09 AM
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Yeah, it was Mshray -- see the Drive thread for the deets.

Missed "Liar, Liar" to my dismay.  Now getting a song I thought was Aretha for *years*.

And yes, "Rolling Stone" and "Satisfaction" are cinches, as is something from (yay) the Beatles, probably either "Ticket to Ride" or "Day Tripper."  I'm betting the former.  Also betting that we hear from the DC5, maybe "Any Way You Want It."  I just hope it's not "Because," one of the worst songs ever written.


And if we hear "Rolling Stone" it'll probably be the longest song of the set by 2 minutes. I expect this set will probably be done by 10:35 at the outside.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:10:09 AM
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Now getting a song I thought was Aretha for *years*.


as bonnie raitt would say, you're "not the only one."
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 10:10:48 AM
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Yeah, it was Mshray -- see the Drive thread for the deets.

Missed "Liar, Liar" to my dismay.  Now getting a song I thought was Aretha for *years*.

And yes, "Rolling Stone" and "Satisfaction" are cinches, as is something from (yay) the Beatles, probably either "Ticket to Ride" or "Day Tripper."  I'm betting the former.  Also betting that we hear from the DC5, maybe "Any Way You Want It."  I just hope it's not "Because," one of the worst songs ever written.


I'm sure we get Beatles, but "Satisfaction" & "Like A Rolling Stone" might just be too obvious.  Says here we get the Beau Brummels (SF's own) though.
Title: Re: Yardbirds, Heart Full of Soul
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:11:08 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "ggould"
I get so confused, Jeff Beck and/or Jimmy Page?
or Eric?


someone left right after this song was released. i think it was eric.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:11:57 AM
VHM: captain peachfuzz!!!!
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Gazoo on March 18, 2005, 10:12:32 AM
BOS2 to notorious reprobates!
Title: Re: Yardbirds, Heart Full of Soul
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:12:41 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "ggould"
I get so confused, Jeff Beck and/or Jimmy Page?
or Eric?


someone left right after this song was released. i think it was eric.
You know, all three historic guitarists came and went in such a short span of time, it's astounding what sort of guitar vortex the Yardbirds were.  Just like John Mayall.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Alicat on March 18, 2005, 10:12:55 AM
ooohhh Boris and Natasha.
I loved Bullwinkle.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:13:09 AM
ha!! "but you're arabs!"
Title: Roy Head, Treat Her Right
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:13:27 AM
is my memory still working?
Title: Re: Yardbirds, Heart Full of Soul
Post by: Gazoo on March 18, 2005, 10:13:59 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "ggould"
I get so confused, Jeff Beck and/or Jimmy Page?
or Eric?


someone left right after this song was released. i think it was eric.

I recall reading that Eric left after "For Your Love" because he wanted something bluesier, not so much pop and vaguely Eastern-sounding.  Don't know if FYL came before or after HFOS, though.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:14:05 AM
BOS Fractured Fairy Tales!!

Paul Frees rules!  Ditto for Jay Ward!
Title: Re: Yardbirds, Heart Full of Soul
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 10:14:05 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "ggould"
I get so confused, Jeff Beck and/or Jimmy Page?
or Eric?


the authoritative answer from Allmusic:

Song Review by Bruce Eder
"Heart Full of Soul" was the Yardbirds' fourth single and their immediate follow-up to their first hit, "For Your Love," but it was much more than that — it was the song that introduced the group's real sound, or something close to it, to the mass public, and also helped mark the opening of a new, experimental era in British rock. The song came from the pen of Graham Gouldman, a composer/performer (later with 10CC) who had also written "For Your Love." That earlier song, although it had been a hit, didn't really represent the group's sound; indeed, it had played a key role in the exit of lead guitarist Eric Clapton, who couldn't abide "For Your Love"'s pop music attributes, especially the use of the reverb-laden harpsichord as the lead instrument. The group's recording of "Heart Full of Soul," by contrast, was very representative of the Yardbirds' music and was a production that all members of the group pursued with interest and enthusiasm. Indeed, where Eric Clapton had been dealt out of "For Your Love," his successor, Jeff Beck, played a vital role in the arrangement and recording of "Heart Full of Soul." It had been the idea of the group's manager, Giorgio Gomelsky, to use a sitar as the lead instrument on the song — this notion got as far as a rehearsal and an attempt at a recording at Advision Studios in March of 1965, but the Indian musician brought to the session couldn't play in time with the group. It was Jeff Beck who saved the song and the session with his fuzztone guitar licks, which mimicked the sound of a sitar. With rhythm guitarist Chris Dreja playing a metal-strung acoustic guitar, the effect was a startling breakthrough on a pop single for the period. The song expanded the range of guitar sounds that the public knew and understood, in much the same manner as the Rolling Stones' "Satisfaction," except that "Heart Full of Soul" was recorded first, two months earlier, and released before the Stones' recording was made. And where the latter song used the fuzztone guitar to imitate a Stax Records-style horn section, "Heart Full of Soul" reached outside of Western music altogether, imitating the sound of a Hindustani instrument. The song was not only a major hit (and, finally, one that matched the group's real sound) but an immensely influential record, inspiring hundreds of bands to try and imitate Beck's guitar and a significant number of those to look beyond Western music for their inspiration on songs. Along with the Beatles' "I Feel Fine" and the Stones' "Satisfaction," "Heart Full of Soul" heralded in a new phase of exoticism in popular music, letting the "genie" of musical experimentation out of its bottle and starting a process that would completely alter the shape of popular music, starting branches of psychedelic and progressive rock, in both of which the Yardbirds would participate fully. Strangely enough, after "I'm a Man," "Heart Full of Soul" remained in the group's repertory longer than almost any other song, right until the final tour with Jimmy Page on the eve of the group's transformation into Led Zeppelin.
Title: Re: Roy Head, Treat Her Right
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:14:10 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
is my memory still working?
sometimes I get this confused with Mohair Slim, or Mohair whatever.
Title: Re: Roy Head, Treat Her Right
Post by: Gazoo on March 18, 2005, 10:14:45 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
is my memory still working?


You nailed it.  Now known to a new generation as "that sax riff that plays during romp-sequences in movie ads."
Title: Re: Yardbirds, Heart Full of Soul
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:15:10 AM
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"


someone left right after this song was released. i think it was eric.

I recall reading that Eric left after "For Your Love" because he wanted something bluesier, not so much pop and vaguely Eastern-sounding.  Don't know if FYL came before or after HFOS, though.


oh - perhaps you've got it then. i probably have the wrong song.
Title: Positively 4th St
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:15:39 AM
BOS, and a good alternative to Like a Rolling Stone!
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Davefish on March 18, 2005, 10:15:59 AM
Ooh, excellent curve ball from Dave to play "Positively Fourth Street".  A very nice choice, and a reallllllly swell set.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:16:14 AM
Right album, wrong song--second time this week.

BOS Positively 4th Street
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Gazoo on March 18, 2005, 10:16:51 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "Gazoo"
Yeah, it was Mshray -- see the Drive thread for the deets.

Missed "Liar, Liar" to my dismay.  Now getting a song I thought was Aretha for *years*.

And yes, "Rolling Stone" and "Satisfaction" are cinches, as is something from (yay) the Beatles, probably either "Ticket to Ride" or "Day Tripper."  I'm betting the former.  Also betting that we hear from the DC5, maybe "Any Way You Want It."  I just hope it's not "Because," one of the worst songs ever written.


I'm sure we get Beatles, but "Satisfaction" & "Like A Rolling Stone" might just be too obvious.  Says here we get the Beau Brummels (SF's own) though.

MShray scores on the Dylan tip, though "4th Street" can hardly be called un-obvious.  Still a great bitchfest.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Alicat on March 18, 2005, 10:17:03 AM
Everyone needs to phone in to reinforce we need more frequent visits to these classic years. 65 is AWESOME!
Title: was this actually on Highway 61?
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:17:18 AM
Quote from: "urth"
Right album, wrong song--second time this week.

BOS Positively 4th Street
Title: Re: was this actually on Highway 61?
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:19:22 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "urth"
Right album, wrong song--second time this week.

BOS Positively 4th Street
http://bobdylan.com/albums/highway.html
Title: Re: was this actually on Highway 61?
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:19:29 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "urth"
Right album, wrong song--second time this week.

BOS Positively 4th Street


ayup.
Title: Re: was this actually on Highway 61?
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:20:37 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "urth"
Right album, wrong song--second time this week.

BOS Positively 4th Street


ayup.


a-nope. :) i just pulled this album out a couple of weeks ago because i wanted to hear this song. i could have sworn i heard it then, too. weird. maybe there are two versions? i'll check at home later. maybe i was just projecting.
Title: Re: was this actually on Highway 61?
Post by: Davefish on March 18, 2005, 10:21:09 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "urth"
Right album, wrong song--second time this week.

BOS Positively 4th Street


ayup.

Was that me?  Which song do ya mean?
Title: Re: was this actually on Highway 61?
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 10:22:16 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "urth"
Right album, wrong song--second time this week.

BOS Positively 4th Street


none of the above, this was a single & didn't appear on an LP until Bob Dylan's Greatest Hits in '67.
Title: the Supremes, Come See About Me
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:23:04 AM
not sure if this is the best Dave coulda done in choosing a Motown tune, but he's from that part of the country, so I defer.  I don't even know if I've got the title right.
Title: Re: was this actually on Highway 61?
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:24:43 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "urth"
Right album, wrong song--second time this week.

BOS Positively 4th Street


Actually I looked it up on Allmusic, and it looks like it might have just been a single--don't think it appeared on an album until Bob's Greatest Hits in 67.
Title: Re: the Supremes, Come See About Me
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:24:53 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
not sure if this is the best Dave coulda done in choosing a Motown tune, but he's from that part of the country, so I defer.  I don't even know if I've got the title right.


dave *always* goes for the supremes. i always go for the taco supremes.
Title: The Animals, It's My Life
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:24:54 AM
what a classic garage band bass/guitar riff!
Title: It's My Life
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 10:25:37 AM
I think my BOS goes to the Animals.  In this context this sounds so much more garage-like than it does when KFRC plays it.

Nice, simple, compelling bass line.
Title: Re: the Supremes, Come See About Me
Post by: Gazoo on March 18, 2005, 10:25:52 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
not sure if this is the best Dave coulda done in choosing a Motown tune, but he's from that part of the country, so I defer.  I don't even know if I've got the title right.

Title is correct, as is the assessment: CSAM sounds downright primitive compared to other HDH efforts ("Ask the Lonely" would have been a good one for this year).

Nice job with the Animals, though.
Title: Re: was this actually on Highway 61?
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:26:03 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "urth"
Right album, wrong song--second time this week.

BOS Positively 4th Street


none of the above, this was a single & didn't appear on an LP until Bob Dylan's Greatest Hits in '67.



You've got a lot of JINX!!!
Title: Re: was this actually on Highway 61?
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 10:27:03 AM
Quote from: "urth"
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "urth"
Right album, wrong song--second time this week.

BOS Positively 4th Street


Actually I looked it up on Allmusic, and it looks like it might have just been a single--don't think it appeared on an album until Bob's Greatest Hits in 67.


jinx!
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:27:49 AM
alright! it's good news week!!
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 10:28:23 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
alright! it's good news week!!


who does this?  I love it!
Title: Re: was this actually on Highway 61?
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:28:44 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "urth"
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "urth"
Right album, wrong song--second time this week.

BOS Positively 4th Street


Actually I looked it up on Allmusic, and it looks like it might have just been a single--don't think it appeared on an album until Bob's Greatest Hits in 67.


jinx!


Double jinx!!
Title: I don't know the artist
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:28:53 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
alright! it's good news week!!
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Gazoo on March 18, 2005, 10:29:06 AM
Have you heard the news?  Not only no, I haven't heard this song before.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:29:17 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
alright! it's good news week!!


who does this?  I love it!


i want to say the standells, but i'm sure that's incorrect.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:29:40 AM
there's my welsh boy!!
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Alicat on March 18, 2005, 10:30:06 AM
oooh  ohhh (Horshack noises) Tom Jones doing Coke!
Title: Tom Jones coke ad
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:30:21 AM
Dave must have a whole album full of artists doing coke ads. The Vanilla Fudge one is nearing katrina status.

BOS2 (or is it 3?) You Won't See Me
Title: the Beatles, Yay!, You Won't See Me
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:30:36 AM
great non-obvious choice
Title: Re: Tom Jones coke ad
Post by: Alicat on March 18, 2005, 10:31:15 AM
Quote from: "urth"
Dave must have a whole album full of artists doing coke ads. The Vanilla Fudge one is nearing katrina status.

BOS2 (or is it 3?) You Won't See Me

Gotta go for the 10-way here.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Gazoo on March 18, 2005, 10:31:40 AM
Ooh!  "You Won't See Me" is a fine choice to close down this show.  One of the first Beatle songs I remember hearing, along with "I'm Looking Through You," on the old cartoon.

Worth seeking out Anne Murray's saloon-worthy cover of it.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 10:31:56 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
alright! it's good news week!!


who does this?  I love it!


i want to say the standells, but i'm sure that's incorrect.


Hedgehoppers Anonymous (I had to look it up), appears on an album called 25 Hits From the British Invasion
Title: not worthy of a ten-way tie!
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:32:45 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
alright! it's good news week!!


who does this?  I love it!


i want to say the standells, but i'm sure that's incorrect.
\

Hedgehoppers Anonymous (I had to look it up), appears on a album called 25 Hits From the British Invasion
Title: Re: the Beatles, Yay!, You Won't See Me
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:33:04 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
great non-obvious choice


One of Lennon/McCartney's most catchy melodies. This is my fave period in Beatledom (Rubber Soul/Revolver).

And it sounds lovely, if only because we've never (or not for many many years) heard it in the context of 10@10.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:33:28 AM
Quote from: "urth"
I expect this set will probably be done by 10:35 at the outside.


with the backann, you'll be right on the mark.
Title: Re: not worthy of a ten-way tie!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:34:10 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
alright! it's good news week!!


who does this?  I love it!


i want to say the standells, but i'm sure that's incorrect.
\

Hedgehoppers Anonymous (I had to look it up), appears on a album called 25 Hits From the British Invasion


not worthy? why not? do the lyrics scare you? :)
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:34:33 AM
Shakin' All Over was the GUESS WHO?!?!?!??

I'm speechless! I didn't know they were even recording then!
Title: Re: not worthy of a ten-way tie!
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:35:35 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
alright! it's good news week!!


who does this?  I love it!


i want to say the standells, but i'm sure that's incorrect.
\

Hedgehoppers Anonymous (I had to look it up), appears on a album called 25 Hits From the British Invasion


not worthy? why not? do the lyrics scare you? :)
I just don't think it ranks up with the others, that's all.  Kinda dated and hokey.  Of course, you young'uns might feel the same about the rest of the set too!
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:35:35 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "urth"
I expect this set will probably be done by 10:35 at the outside.


with the backann, you'll be right on the mark.


And including the promo for the 10@10 bonus cut, it indeed is.
Title: Re: not worthy of a ten-way tie!
Post by: Gazoo on March 18, 2005, 10:35:49 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
alright! it's good news week!!


who does this?  I love it!


i want to say the standells, but i'm sure that's incorrect.
\

Hedgehoppers Anonymous (I had to look it up), appears on a album called 25 Hits From the British Invasion


not worthy? why not? do the lyrics scare you? :)

Well, this was most assuredly not a "good news week."  At least I can chill to the Soul Spectrum for the next few hours, barring more workplace hassles.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:35:50 AM
ok, now everyone go read about kim jong and oral sex. i posted the link in the funny internet stuff thread.
Title: TMAIB
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:36:27 AM
Quote from: "urth"
Shakin' All Over what the GUESS WHO?!?!?!??

I'm speechless! I didn't know they were even recording then!
TMAIB=Tell Me About It Baby!
Title: Re: TMAIB
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:37:16 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "urth"
Shakin' All Over what the GUESS WHO?!?!?!??

I'm speechless! I didn't know they were even recording then!
TMAIB=Tell Me About It Baby!
Well, Detroit is a lot closer to Canada.  I don't think it was a hit out here, but I could be wrong.
Title: Re: not worthy of a ten-way tie!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 10:38:01 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
I just don't think it ranks up with the others, that's all.  Kinda dated and hokey.  Of course, you young'uns might feel the same about the rest of the set too!


dated, maybe, not hokey. i think the lyrics of "good news week" are very non-hokey. so much so that i pay attention to them!
Title: Re: not worthy of a ten-way tie!
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 10:39:07 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "ggould"
I just don't think it ranks up with the others, that's all.  Kinda dated and hokey.  Of course, you young'uns might feel the same about the rest of the set too!


dated, maybe, not hokey. i think the lyrics of "good news week" are very non-hokey. so much so that i pay attention to them!
well, I for one am ignorant of the lyrics; got 'em handy!  this wasn't a hit in these parts.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:56:43 AM
And when was the last time we cranked out 6 pages of comments during the course of one (35 minute) set? Probably not since the old board, methinks.
Title: Re: TMAIB
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 11:00:36 AM
Quote from: "ggould"
Quote from: "urth"
Shakin' All Over what the GUESS WHO?!?!?!??

I'm speechless! I didn't know they were even recording then!
TMAIB=Tell Me About It Baby!


Me too.  My co worker was just asking me a question when Dave said that & my face musta looked weird, 'cuz she kinda apologized right away for asking & I had to say no, no, no, it's not your question that was strange.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: princessofcairo on March 18, 2005, 11:00:36 AM
Quote from: "urth"
And when was the last time we cranked out 6 pages of comments during the course of one (35 minute) set? Probably not since the old board, methinks.


and without reg around? never, i'm sure.  :)
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 11:02:44 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "urth"
And when was the last time we cranked out 6 pages of comments during the course of one (35 minute) set? Probably not since the old board, methinks.


and without reg around? never, i'm sure.  :)


yeah, if mister 1429 posts was here it woulda been 8 pages.

Urth, you are for sure gonna record this onto disc tonight, right?  Or at least get up early enough in the a.m.?
Title: 10@10 bonus track
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 11:22:42 AM
Donovan, Try and Catch the Wind

I heard it accidentally a few minutes ago, quite a delay from end of 10@10, eh?
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 11:26:59 AM
Quote from: "mshray"
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "urth"
And when was the last time we cranked out 6 pages of comments during the course of one (35 minute) set? Probably not since the old board, methinks.


and without reg around? never, i'm sure.  :)


yeah, if mister 1429 posts was here it woulda been 8 pages.

Urth, you are for sure gonna record this onto disc tonight, right?  Or at least get up early enough in the a.m.?


I'm gonna for sure try to. I've been good about remembering lately, but if I'm out or fall asleep on the sofa, bad things could happen.

If it's the first or second set in the replay tomorrow, likely I won't get it--I'm NEVER up before 8:30 on Saturdays.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: mshray on March 18, 2005, 11:46:33 AM
Quote from: "princessofcairo"
Quote from: "urth"
And when was the last time we cranked out 6 pages of comments during the course of one (35 minute) set? Probably not since the old board, methinks.


and without reg around? never, i'm sure.  :)


Rod seems to have been absent also.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: RGMike on March 18, 2005, 12:24:00 PM
Quote from: "mshray"
yeah, if mister 1429 posts was here it woulda been 8 pages.


very funny. Those days may be over for a while as work Really. Really. Sucks.  But I look forward to the replay, even if I did hear Hedgehoppers Anonymous yesterday on CG.

So Gaz, when did you finally figure out Fontella Bass wasn't Ree-Ree? A guy at my college radio station always mispronounced her name as "Fontella Base"  (he was into instruments, not fish, I guess).
Title: asynchronous communication
Post by: ggould on March 18, 2005, 04:28:29 PM
Quote from: "RGMike"
I look forward to the replay
indeed
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: RGMike on March 18, 2005, 09:10:14 PM
BTW, Hedgehoppers Anonymous was one of Jonathan "Everyone's Gone to the Moon" King's many projects (I think he was involved with "Beach Baby" too). "Good News Week" was a huge hit in England but failed to make the Top 40 over here, though it was a regional hit that did quite well in a lot of markets (I'm guessing Detroit was one).
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Alicat on March 18, 2005, 09:24:29 PM
Well, if Urth doesn't get it on dat to disc, I'll get it on cassette and maybe try replay radio again if I can get it for a free trial again.

work sucks is kind of a universal thing eh? Remind yourself that a paid working day is better than an unemployed or unpaid day. :?  

When things are rough at work, I just go to my happy place which at this point is Opening Day at SBC. I see CalTrain and envision myself on it, going up to SF. Pregame parking lot festivities, then no responsibility other than drinking beer, people watching, and cheering for the GIANTS! mmmmmmmm, happy. If for some unfortunate reason I do end up without a job come June, methinks I'll be spending lots of time at Giants day games if tickets are free.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: urth on March 18, 2005, 10:34:47 PM
Quote from: "urth"
Quote from: "mshray"

Urth, you are for sure gonna record this onto disc tonight, right?  Or at least get up early enough in the a.m.?


I'm gonna for sure try to. I've been good about remembering lately, but if I'm out or fall asleep on the sofa, bad things could happen.

If it's the first or second set in the replay tomorrow, likely I won't get it--I'm NEVER up before 8:30 on Saturdays.


Mission accomplished. At least the recording part. Hope to get it transferred to disc over the weekend.

<listening to the dulcet strains of You Won't See Me as I type this>

Fab set. Def. a keeper.
Title: Whoooppeee!!! It worked! 1965 today!
Post by: Alicat on March 18, 2005, 10:40:27 PM
You're great. Can I place the first order for a CD copy please?
You going to be at Opening Day?